Re: xaralx package

Op 18-09-16 om 16:16 schreef Michael Fothergill: I tried using gdebi to install xaralx deb file. The error I get seems to suggest I need a newer version of the libjpeg package than I currently have.. See here:​ root@rhinoceros:/home/mikef/Documents/xaralx# gdebi

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 19:23, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 15 Sep 2016 19:08, "Frank" wrote: > > > > Op 15-09-16 om 19:32 schreef Michael Fothergill: > >> > >> On 15 Sep 2016 18:17, "Frank" wrote: > >>> > >>> That's

Re: xaralx package

Op 15-09-16 om 19:32 schreef Michael Fothergill: On 15 Sep 2016 18:17, "Frank" wrote: That's 'only' from March 2014. Haven't tried working with it, though. So no idea if you can use it on current Debian (it does install and open on this Testing box). So does that mean

Re: xaralx package

On 15 Sep 2016 18:17, "Frank" wrote: > > Op 15-09-16 om 18:11 schreef Greg Wooledge: > >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote: >>> >>> ???http://www.xaraxtreme.org/download.html??? >> >> >> "The binaries we distribute require libstdc++ version

Re: xaralx package

Op 15-09-16 om 18:11 schreef Greg Wooledge: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote: ???http://www.xaraxtreme.org/download.html??? "The binaries we distribute require libstdc++ version 5, which is not installed as standard on some modern distributions (for

Re: xaralx package

Hi, > Michael Fothergill wrote: > The download page says that the binary should run on a 64 bit machine in > what it calls compatability mode. > http://www.xaraxtreme.org/download.html So the binaries are ready for ten year old Ubuntu. This increases the chances for 32 bit multi-arch. I guess

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 17:11, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > ???http://www.xaraxtreme.org/download.html??? > > "The binaries we distribute require libstdc++ version 5, which is not > installed as standard

Re: xaralx package

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote: > ???http://www.xaraxtreme.org/download.html??? "The binaries we distribute require libstdc++ version 5, which is not installed as standard on some modern distributions (for example Ubuntu 5.10)."

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 16:48, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Fothergill wrote: > > $ file xaralx > > xaralx: ELF 32-bit ... dynamically linked ... for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, > > That's really old. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Timeline > > > $ ldd xaralx > >

Re: xaralx package

Hi, Michael Fothergill wrote: > $ file xaralx > xaralx: ELF 32-bit ... dynamically linked ... for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, That's really old. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Timeline > $ ldd xaralx > not a dynamic executable Probably just too old dynamics to be recognizable nowadays. The

Re: xaralx package

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote: > mikef@rhinoceros:~/Documents/xaralx/bin$ ldd "$(which xaralx)" > ldd: ./: not regular file Sorry. I didn't realize you were cd'ing into the directory where the file was, and that this directory was not in your $PATH at all.

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 15:54, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:51:28PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > $ ldd xaralx > > ldd actually needs a path to the executable. It doesn't search $PATH. > > $ ldd "$(which xaralx)" > > > would be one way to do it.

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 15:51, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Thursday, 15 September 2016 14:24:37 CEST Michael Fothergill wrote: > > What I am I doing wrong here? > > Could you run: > > $ file xaralx > ​Result: mikef@rhinoceros:~/Documents/xaralx/bin$ pwd

Re: xaralx package

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:51:28PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > $ ldd xaralx ldd actually needs a path to the executable. It doesn't search $PATH. $ ldd "$(which xaralx)" would be one way to do it.

Re: xaralx package

On Thursday, 15 September 2016 14:24:37 CEST Michael Fothergill wrote: > What I am I doing wrong here? Could you run: $ file xaralx and $ ldd xaralx All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 11:34, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On 15 September 2016 at 10:59, Mark Fletcher wrote: > >> >> >>> >>> My suggestion would be install apt-file, either using aptitude or >> apt-get or synaptic if you prefer. >>

Re: xaralx package

On 15 September 2016 at 10:59, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > >> >> My suggestion would be install apt-file, either using aptitude or apt-get > or synaptic if you prefer. > > Then as root: > apt-file update > > Once that is done, you can do apt-file search libpangoxft and see what

Re: xaralx package

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 16:09, Michael Fothergill < michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Dear Folks, > > There used to be a xaralx package for debian but it has been discontinued. > > I tried installing the tar file from the xara extreme web site but got an > err

xaralx package

Dear Folks, There used to be a xaralx package for debian but it has been discontinued. I tried installing the tar file from the xara extreme web site but got an error about libpangoxft-1.0 not being present etc. I tried installing libpango dev but synaptic said some packages were missing