Re: xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:01:52PM -0800, David Wright wrote: Xemacs (xemacs21-21.4.6-7) on Debian appears to be completely horked. There are tons of bug reports going back over 2-1/2 years, many without so much as an initial reply from the maintainer. Many appear to cover very simple but

Re: xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-09 Thread John F Davis
by clicking the tab. JD Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]@softhome.net on 04/06/2002 09:23:53 PM To:debian-user@lists.debian.org cc: Subject:Re: xemacs on debian = horked On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:01:52PM -0800, David Wright wrote: Xemacs (xemacs21-21.4.6-7) on Debian appears to be completely

Re: xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-09 Thread Alan Shutko
John F Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does the new emacs support tabbed windows? Not yet, though I seem to recall some discussion about putting in the infrastructure to do it right a while back, so someone might be interested in doing it. In all fairness, the bug list for Emacs21 looks

xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-05 Thread David Wright
Xemacs (xemacs21-21.4.6-7) on Debian appears to be completely horked. There are tons of bug reports going back over 2-1/2 years, many without so much as an initial reply from the maintainer. Many appear to cover very simple but very annoying issues. What's going on? Is this package orphaned? A

Re: xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-05 Thread Dan Griswold
I have found Xemacs to be rock solid on Debian. I've run it on Potato, Woody, and Sid. When something has gone wrong, it's usually been another package. And I strongly suspect that most of those bug reports refer to old versions. Maybe this means there's a problem with the bug reporting system

Re: xemacs on debian = horked

2002-04-05 Thread Shyamal Prasad
David == David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Xemacs (xemacs21-21.4.6-7) on Debian appears to be David completely horked. There are tons of bug reports going David back over 2-1/2 years, many without so much as an initial David reply from the maintainer. Many appear