RE: xfs+xfstt or xfs-xtt

2000-08-14 Thread Konstantinos E Maras
I ve done this change a few weeks ago. Both worked fine for me. I believe that (xfs + xfstt) use less memory than xfs-xtt, right now on my system RSS of xfs-xtt is ~3.5K but this seems to depend on configuration and usage (how many TTF requests from your apps) Main advantages for me: - I can use f

xfs+xfstt or xfs-xtt

2000-08-13 Thread Jan Ulrich Hasecke
Hi! I am currently running xfs + xfstt on Potato with xserver-i128. Would you recommend to change to xfs-xtt? Does it uses less memory? What advantages are there? Are there problems changing the Font Server? TIA juh -- Heute ist der 3. Oktober! Basta! http://www.sudelbuch.de/1999/19991109.htm