John L Fjellstad wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
xfree86 changed its licence to something not very free, so what
happened is that xorg foundation took the last remaining
freely-licenced xfree86 code and renamed it xorg, then started working
on that. Loads of other distros
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:22 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
xfree86 changed its licence to something not very free, so what
happened is that xorg foundation took the last remaining
freely-licenced xfree86 code and renamed it xorg, then started working
on that.
I think the actual license
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
xfree86 changed its licence to something not very free, so what
happened is that xorg foundation took the last remaining
freely-licenced xfree86 code and renamed it xorg, then started working
on that. Loads of other distros use xorg now, and I
I am not very clear about the differences between xorg xfree86. Why
did we move from xfree86 in sarge to xorg in Etch? I tried to google it.
I could get only individual information but not a comparision.
Thanks
Raghu
It is better to throw windows out of the computer than throwing
On 1/15/07, Raghu Kodali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not very clear about the differences between xorg xfree86. Why
did we move from xfree86 in sarge to xorg in Etch? I tried to google it.
I could get only individual information but not a comparision.
xfree86 changed its licence
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:59:22 +0530
Raghu Kodali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not very clear about the differences between xorg xfree86. Why
did we move from xfree86 in sarge to xorg in Etch? I tried to google
it. I could get only individual information but not a comparision.
Licence issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raghu Kodali wrote:
I am not very clear about the differences between xorg xfree86. Why
did we move from xfree86 in sarge to xorg in Etch? I tried to google it.
I could get only individual information but not a comparision.
License issues
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
could have it, while
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:22:24 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Kevin Mark wrote:
One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So
Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for developers to contribute. Someone can make such a statement without
being an aspiring contributor himself. I see neither a promise nor a
lie in what he writes.
The lie was this: stating that it was not allowed to happen.
Anytime the topic came up,
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 16:24:04 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
for developers to contribute. Someone can make such a statement without
being an aspiring contributor himself. I see neither a promise nor a
lie in what he writes.
The lie was this: stating that it was
Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 16:24:04 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
for developers to contribute. Someone can make such a statement without
being an aspiring contributor himself. I see neither a promise nor a
lie in what he writes.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:06:22PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 16:24:04 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
for developers to contribute. Someone can make such a statement without
being an aspiring contributor himself. I see neither a promise nor
Hello Kevin.
Kevin Mark, 05.11.2006 03:08:
One of the major differences between XFree86 and Xorg is the use of
modularized source.
Nope. That’s the difference between Release 6.9 and 7.0 and has nothing to do
with differences between XFree86 and Xorg. (Although the former doesn’t have a
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hello Kevin.
Kevin Mark, 05.11.2006 03:08:
One of the major differences between XFree86 and Xorg is the use of
modularized source.
Nope.
Huh?
That???s the difference between Release 6.9 and 7.0 and has nothing to
do
Hello Kevin.
Kevin Mark, 05.11.2006 19:03:
That means: if you want a monolithic X-server, you can have one with Xorg
too.
So its possible to have a monolithic Xorg X server. Debian does not package
one. Who does?
How about Debian[0]?
(I would have accepted your statement if was the
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to XFree86 development
being harder than Xorg. To me this is a differnce,
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:04:28PM +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hello Kevin.
Kevin Mark, 05.11.2006 19:03:
That means: if you want a monolithic X-server, you can have one with Xorg
too.
So its possible to have a monolithic Xorg X server. Debian does not package
one. Who does?
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to
Hey there. What X system does my recent (installed yesterday ) debian etch system use? Isn't there adifference between xfree86 and xorg? The docs I found on the debian site are for xfree86 but my system seems to have X11 / xorg stuff on it? Sort me out if I'm clueless.
Respect.
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 04:38:36PM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Hey there. What X system does my recent (installed yesterday ) debian etch
system use? Isn't there adifference between xfree86 and xorg? The docs I
found on the debian site are for xfree86 but my system seems to have X11 /
xorg stuff
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 04:38:36PM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Hey there. What X system does my recent (installed yesterday ) debian
etch
system use?
xorg
Isn't there adifference between xfree86 and xorg?
yes. i think xorg is a fork of xf86. try google.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital
ChadDavis wrote:
Hey there. What X system does my recent (installed yesterday ) debian
etch system use? Isn't there adifference between xfree86 and xorg?
The docs I found on the debian site are for xfree86 but my system
seems to have X11 / xorg stuff on it? Sort me out if I'm clueless.
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 05:00:28PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 04:38:36PM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Hey there. What X system does my recent (installed yesterday ) debian etch
system use? Isn't there adifference between xfree86 and xorg? The docs I
found on the debian
xorg est un fork de xfree86 ?
xfree86 : c'est l'ancêtre ?
xorg a pris le dessus sur xfree86 ?
dans sarge, c'est bien xfree86 ?
merci d'avance
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench
Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du vendredi 04 août 2006, vers 20:09,
hector dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
xorg est un fork de xfree86 ?
Oui.
xfree86 : c'est l'ancêtre ?
Oui.
xorg a pris le dessus sur xfree86 ?
Oui.
dans sarge, c'est bien xfree86 ?
Oui.
--
I WILL NOT GREASE THE
Vincent Bernat a écrit :
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du vendredi 04 août 2006, vers 20:09,hector dupont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
y a encore un journal tv ? je croyais qu'il n'y avait que de la pub ?
xorg est un fork de xfree86 ?
Oui.
xfree86 : c'est l'ancêtre ?
Am Mittwoch 08 Februar 2006 09:37 schrieb Klaus Becker:
Ich habe vergeblich versucht, mittels dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
wieder auf xfree86 umzusteigen. Entweder es kamen Fehlermeldungen
oder es kamen keine, aber bei einem anschließenden startx kam die
gleiche Fehlermeldung: no screens
Moin,
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim Neustart
hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
Ich habe vergeblich versucht, mittels dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg wieder
auf xfree86 umzusteigen. Entweder es kamen Fehlermeldungen oder es kamen
keine, aber bei
Klaus Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
?! Seit wann hat Sarge Xorg?
S°
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/
--
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 09:43, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Klaus Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
?! Seit wann hat Sarge Xorg?
das ist sicher ein backport
Klaus
On 08.02.06 09:37:12, Klaus Becker wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim Neustart
hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
Was steht im X11-Log?
Ich habe vergeblich versucht, mittels dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg wieder
auf xfree86 umzusteigen.
Klaus Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin,
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
Ich habe vergeblich versucht, mittels dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
wieder auf xfree86 umzusteigen. Entweder es kamen
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 09:37:12, Klaus Becker wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
Was steht im X11-Log?
Am Ende von /var/Xorg.0.log steht:
(II)
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 09:37:12, Klaus Becker wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart hatte ich aber kein X mehr: no screens found.
Was steht im
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 15:31, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 09:37:12, Klaus Becker wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg gewählt. Klappte auch zuerst, beim
Neustart
On 08.02.06 16:00:29, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 15:31, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 09:37:12, Klaus Becker wrote:
unter Sarge-AMD86 hab' ich xorg
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 17:36, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 16:00:29, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 15:31, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06
On 08.02.06 17:21:17, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 17:36, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 16:00:29, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 15:31, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8 Février 2006 12:38,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2006, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Klaus Becker:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 17:36, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 16:00:29, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mittwoch 8 Februar 2006 15:31, Andreas Pakulat a écrit :
On 08.02.06 14:31:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Le Mercredi 8
ich hab' den xorg-von Ati installiert, dpkg-reconfigue xserver-xorg
ausgeführt, vesa statt ati ausgewählt und habe wieder x!
Mal interessehalber: Was steht nun in deiner xorg.conf als Wert für
'Driver'?
Welchen xorg-von Ati? Was für eine Grafikkarte?
~$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf |
Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2006, 18:03 +0100 schrieb Klaus Becker:
ich hab' den xorg-von Ati installiert, dpkg-reconfigue xserver-xorg
ausgeführt, vesa statt ati ausgewählt und habe wieder x!
Mal interessehalber: Was steht nun in deiner xorg.conf als Wert für
'Driver'?
Welchen
42 matches
Mail list logo
