Re: 515...@bugs.debian.org

2009-02-24 Thread Chris Burkhardt
Ink Bottle wrote: I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated, or not treated. It was determined that the bug was not in midori but in swfdec or libwebkit. So the bug was reassigned to swfdec. It turns out the bug was actually in libwebkit (as you noted in your last comment on the

515...@bugs.debian.org

2009-02-23 Thread Ink Bottle
I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated, or not treated. regards -- Ink Bottle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: 515...@bugs.debian.org

2009-02-23 Thread Ink Bottle
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Ink Bottle ink.bot...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Ink Bottle ink.bot...@yahoo.com Subject: 515...@bugs.debian.org To: deb debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 1:16 AM I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated, or not treated

Re: 515...@bugs.debian.org

2009-02-23 Thread Bob Cox
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 17:16:20 -0800, Ink Bottle (ink.bot...@yahoo.com) wrote: I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated, or not treated. It looks like your bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515159 was forwarded by one of the package maintainers to