On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:16:40AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > 4. If an option has a supermajority requirement, that option must
> >defeat the default option by the ratio of votes specified in the
> >quorum require
Hi,
Here is mail from Mike Ossipoff with code for SSD. I am also
including aj's Perl code that was used in the last election.
manoj
cloneproof_ssd.pl
Description: clone proof ssd
--- Begin Message ---
Some time ago I sent to you a pasted copy of our
website's Python program,
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> 4. If an option has a supermajority requirement, that option must
>defeat the default option by the ratio of votes specified in the
>quorum requirement or the option is eliminated.
^^
is t
Hi,
So who did come up with the mistake "Schultz", and did they eat too many
peanuts? ;-)
Anthony Towns:
> The correct restatement is something more like:
>
> { x | forall y: y >> x --> x >>> y }
>
Or, in understandable language: The Schwartz set is the innermost unbeaten
set, or the sma
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:13:14PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> The Schultz Set = { A | A>>>A }
> Note: Because A==A, it isn't the case that A>>A,
This is clever, but wrong. Consider an election with people voting:
30 x ABCD
40 x ACDB
50 x ADBC
A wins unanimously and is t
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:13:14PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> The Schultz Set = { A | A>>>A }
> Note: Because A==A, it isn't the case that A>>A,
This is clever, but wrong. Consider an election with people voting:
30 x ABCD
40 x ACDB
50 x ADBC
A wins unanimously and is t
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> AFAICT, your version only gives one level of transitivity, which does
> not necessarily suffice.
I have retracted it.
> An explicitly iterative version would have to read along the lines of
>
> Definition: An option F is in the
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:24:14AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:54:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if option G
> > defeats option F, or if there is another option H which defeats G, AND
> > option F de
Raul Miller wrote:
This is not a full draft. In this post, I'm only including
text for replacing A.6 of the constitution. I wanted to
also rewrite the changes to A.3, but I've got to run some
errands tonight and I'm not going to have time to write up
a full draft.
Please let me know of any fla
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:42:37PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> AFAICT, your version only gives one level of transitivity, which does
> not necessarily suffice.
I have retracted it.
> An explicitly iterative version would have to read along the lines of
>
> Definition: An option F is in the
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:24:14AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:54:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if option G
> > defeats option F, or if there is another option H which defeats G, AND
> > option F de
Raul Miller wrote:
This is not a full draft. In this post, I'm only including
text for replacing A.6 of the constitution. I wanted to
also rewrite the changes to A.3, but I've got to run some
errands tonight and I'm not going to have time to write up
a full draft.
Please let me know of any flaw
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
[...]
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if
> > option G defeats option F or if there is some other option
> > H where option H is in t
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
[...]
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if
> > option G defeats option F or if there is some other option
> > H where option H is in t
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:54:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if
> > option G defeats option F or if there is some other option
> > H where option H is in the beat path of G AND option F is in
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:54:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Definition: An option F is in the beat path of option G if
> > option G defeats option F or if there is some other option
> > H where option H is in the beat path of G AND option F is in
> >
I accept Branden's amendment.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:48:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I would like to a very minor amendment to this proposal. I will not
> withdraw my second if you elect not to accept it.
>
> > D. That the maintainer of the Debian Policy Manual, or an appointee of
>
I accept Branden's amendment.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:48:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I would like to a very minor amendment to this proposal. I will not
> withdraw my second if you elect not to accept it.
>
> > D. That the maintainer of the Debian Policy Manual, or an appointee of
>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> This is not a full draft. In this post, I'm only including
> text for replacing A.6 of the constitution. I wanted to
> also rewrite the changes to A.3, but I've got to run some
> errands tonight and I'm not going to have time to write
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:03:54PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> This is not a full draft. In this post, I'm only including
> text for replacing A.6 of the constitution. I wanted to
> also rewrite the changes to A.3, but I've got to run some
> errands tonight and I'm not going to have time to write
20 matches
Mail list logo
