-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is the final day of the nomination period, which started
on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The
campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th
(2003/03/07 0:0:0 UTC), and shall end on 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is the final day of the nomination period, which started
on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The
campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th
(2003/03/07 0:0:0 UTC), and shall end on 200
I was living in central London when I became a Debian Developer. It
is therefore a pleasure to announce my nomination for the DPL while
I'm in London for some research.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hereby announce my intention to run for DPL.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
I was living in central London when I became a Debian Developer. It
is therefore a pleasure to announce my nomination for the DPL while
I'm in London for some research.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hereby announce my intention to run for DPL.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
> into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
Regarding the Feburary 7th draft.
Are the results this draft produces equivalent to the results produced
using this method?
(a) All voters tick an 'approved' box next to all options that would of
been above the default option using the draft method.
(b) Any option which recieves a majority (o
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For
> example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the
> current chairman is AWOL, or likewise with the DPL. What happens then?
The TC chair and s
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:31:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Originally I planned to incorporate whatever feedback I received
> into my Platform, but now I'm less sure that's the right way to go.
It is a bad idea. If you
[I'm considering only issues of intelligability/readability here. I
stipulate that, given basic understanding of math and logic, the
constitution should be self-contained.]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:18:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general reso
Regarding the Feburary 7th draft.
Are the results this draft produces equivalent to the results produced
using this method?
(a) All voters tick an 'approved' box next to all options that would of
been above the default option using the draft method.
(b) Any option which recieves a majority (or
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For
> example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the
> current chairman is AWOL, or likewise with the DPL. What happens then?
The TC chair and s
[I'm considering only issues of intelligability/readability here. I
stipulate that, given basic understanding of math and logic, the
constitution should be self-contained.]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:18:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general reso
12 matches
Mail list logo
