On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of
> some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with
> the information I need to make an informed decision. After all they
> are trying to convinc
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of
> > some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with
> > the information I need to make an informed decision. After all they
> > are trying
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 07:53:54PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On a related note, I'm a little bothered about the result. Obviously
> 144:16 was a win. But only 160 people voted, at most 20% of developers and
> probably more like 15%.
Huh? From http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0002,
] Q
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of
> some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with
> the information I need to make an informed decision. After all they
> are trying to convinc
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:17:25PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Actually, I think it is reasonable for me to expect the proponents of
> > some option to do a fair bit of the work necessary to provide me with
> > the information I need to make an informed decision. After all they
> > are trying
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 07:53:54PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On a related note, I'm a little bothered about the result. Obviously
> 144:16 was a win. But only 160 people voted, at most 20% of developers and
> probably more like 15%.
Huh? From http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0002,
] Q
6 matches
Mail list logo
