C*ialis An improved v*i*@*g*r*@* irredeemable

2004-04-16 Thread Erick Brewer
Debian-vote, What do women tell if their partner take G_e_n_e_r_i_c [EMAIL PROTECTED]@: My (s)exual life became more vivid because my lover could keep erection much longer than usual! ..my husband worried about his erection even when it was good, and our sex failed!.. Taking [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not decided unanimously, the jury doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote?

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not decided unanimously, the jury doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote?

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:55:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy decision? The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt: ] Code in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in .debs and ] in

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not decided unanimously, the jury doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy decision? doesn't

C*ialis An improved [EMAIL PROTECTED]@* irredeemable

2004-04-16 Thread Erick Brewer
Debian-vote, What do women tell if their partner take G_e_n_e_r_i_c [EMAIL PROTECTED]@: My (s)exual life became more vivid because my lover could keep erection much longer than usual! ..my husband worried about his erection even when it was good, and our sex failed!.. Taking [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not decided unanimously, the jury doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote?

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Even if not decided unanimously, the jury doesn't seem to be in much doubt on it where's the GR and the vote?

Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:55:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy decision? The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt: ] Code in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in .debs and ] in