Haven't we met somewhere before? :)))Confession, alas, is the new handshake.
Low rates on Software
Looking for not expensive high-quality software?
Our site might be just what you need.http://nephrocoloptosis.fosraw.biz/OE017/?affiliate_id=233712&campaign_id=601
We can ship worldwide.Nolan Ryan
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:44:03AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Thus this web page should be more like:
>
> Proposal D: Rescinds the previous GR, reverting to the version 1.0 of the
> social contract.
>
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 06, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But no, I misspoke. I'm happy to grant the stuff in the ROM is
> > software, in one sense, but not in another--it can't be changed (it
> > isn't *soft*). For this reason, the term "fi
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:20:24AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> . Firmware blobs that are distributed (e.g. in the Linux kernel or
>XFree86) under a non-free license don't have to be removed from The
>Release
Please stop using XFree86 as an example of a "firmware blob" problem.
It had t
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:31:05AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [..]
> > possible outcomes? Should we amend the Constitution to allow running an
> > election with multiple winners, [..]
>
> Let's do that. This voting stuff is f
Seconded, with s!judgemen.!judgement.!
Simon
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 09:28:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Here is the current version
>
> manoj.
>
> I propose we adopt a foundation document that tries to provide
> guidance and explanation for the transitions required whenever a
>
Thanks, but
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:54:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Quoting Xavier Roche:
> > Yes, seconded.
>
> Seconded as well (if really needed).
With all respect, since we need to get single version agreed, can you
second the shorter version I posted after comments from Davide G.
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 06, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But no, I misspoke. I'm happy to grant the stuff in the ROM is
> > software, in one sense, but not in another--it can't be changed (it
> > isn't *soft*). For this reason, the term "fi
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:20:24AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> . Firmware blobs that are distributed (e.g. in the Linux kernel or
>XFree86) under a non-free license don't have to be removed from The
>Release
Please stop using XFree86 as an example of a "firmware blob" problem.
It had t
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:31:05AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:29:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [..]
> > possible outcomes? Should we amend the Constitution to allow running an
> > election with multiple winners, [..]
>
> Let's do that. This voting stuff is f
Seconded, with s!judgemen.!judgement.!
Simon
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 09:28:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Here is the current version
>
> manoj.
>
> I propose we adopt a foundation document that tries to provide
> guidance and explanation for the transitions required whenever a
>
Thanks, but
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:54:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Quoting Xavier Roche:
> > Yes, seconded.
>
> Seconded as well (if really needed).
With all respect, since we need to get single version agreed, can you
second the shorter version I posted after comments from Davide G.
Quoting Xavier Roche:
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
> >this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
>
> Yes, seconded.
Seconded as well (if really needed).
> > Craig Sanders
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second
>this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]?
Yes, seconded.
> Craig Sanders proposed the following resolution [1] (reformatted):
> ---
14 matches
Mail list logo
