Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just so totally American.
Aha. The united states' incarnation of Gassners Law.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:13, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 12:57:08AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
I don't know what it is about your style of
comunication, but it reminds me more of debate club than rational
discussion in search of a common ground.
The
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:58:45PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:13, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 12:57:08AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
I don't know what it is about your style of
comunication, but it reminds me more of debate
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 23:10]:
I have no interest in blaming people for the present state of affairs --
not AJ, not my co-sponsors of 003 -- only in getting things situated so
we can get back to our job of releasing the most complete Free OS that
ever existed (whatever
On 2004-06-25 06:15:22 +0100 Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:42:04AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
That's just so totally American.
Now there's the ad hominem attack you keep referring to.
Actually, it looks just plain offensive from here it's wrong, and
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:11:47PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
The current vote will determine what the majority of voters think.
Hopefully that will be the end of it.
Not likely. The last vote determined what 3/4 of the voters thought,
and people weren't willing to let
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:42:04AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Ah, so suddenly you're not allowed to discuss issues in case you cause
anybody to change their mind. That really is what Manoj has been
complaining about.
No.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 05:25:28AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
[You have quite neatly just demonstrated what argumentum ad hominem
actually is, though].
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:05:08PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Do you have that phrase on a macro key yet?
He was right that time.
* Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040625 13:25]:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:11:47PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
The current vote will determine what the majority of voters think.
Hopefully that will be the end of it.
Not likely. The last vote determined what 3/4 of the
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:30:03PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I don't recall you complaining at the time about the title or
description.
Perhaps because nobody ever hinted that the resolution would cause the
release manager to change things? Heck, I didn't see any hints that the
He was right that time.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
No, he wasn't. An ad hominem argument appeals to non-rational things,
whereas Hamish pointed out two facts: that Andrew started two general
resolutions and that both of them were rather divisive.
I believe
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:30:03PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Anthony himself told that very plain on -vote, but in a mail in the
non-free-removal thread that was killfiled at that time by most people
reading -vote.
Oh come on, don't tell me I have to follow -vote as well now? That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
Voting starts on Friday, June 18th, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
Votes must be received by Friday, July 2nd, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:25:46PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
He was right that time.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
No, he wasn't. An ad hominem argument appeals to non-rational things,
whereas Hamish pointed out two facts: that Andrew started two general
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:53:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:03:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:55:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt:
] Code in main and contrib
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 12:52:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
The Social Contract does not say: Debian Will Remain 100% Free
Software and Some Other Things That Aren't Software But Which Are Also
Free But Meet a Different Definition Of Free Than That Which Applies
to Software, Plus
16 matches
Mail list logo
