On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:09:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>
> > Propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
> > defined in the Proposal will be applied only for the future
> > content of debian-private maili
* Debian Project Secretary:
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
> will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
> significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
>
> This process will be undertaken under the following cons
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
defined in the Proposal will be applied only for the future
content of debian-private mailing list.
I for myself see no real technical benefit in publishing the ar
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:04:31PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Time Line:
>Proposal and amendment Friday, 18th November 2005
> Tuesday, 29th November, 23:59:59 UTC, 2005
>Discussion Period: Tuesday, 29th November, 23:59:59 UTC, 2005 -
Erm, as
Time Line:
Proposal and amendment Friday, 18th November 2005
Tuesday, 29th November, 23:59:59 UTC, 2005
Discussion Period: Tuesday, 29th November, 23:59:59 UTC, 2005 -
Proposer: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seconds:
1. Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:46:55 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:10:11PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> b) I do not want to be associated with the post in question
>> In other words, if this showed up in google it may hurt my future
>> job prospects post ;-). In this case
6 matches
Mail list logo
