On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:03:03 +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Wouter Verhelst:
>> First of all, I do think we can, per 4.1.3 (as others have already
>> pointed out). However, I don't think that is relevant; "Debian will
>> seek to do foo" doesn't mean "Debian will do foo", and
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.project Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005, Horms wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:09:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> > if there *really* are some DDs who volunteer to spend their time
>> > on old postings it is fine for me but because
* Wouter Verhelst:
>> > In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
>> > will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
>> > significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
>> >
>> > This process will be undertaken under the followin
* Daniel Ruoso:
>> This distinction is important because for years, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> was an aliases for debian-private, and people who sent mail to that
>> address might be very surprised that it's subject to declassification
>> (and that it was sent to hundreds of Debian developers in the fir
Em Sex, 2005-12-02 às 21:16 +0100, Florian Weimer escreveu:
> * Daniel Ruoso:
> > In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
> > will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
> > significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
> What is the "Debian
* Daniel Ruoso:
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
> will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
> significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
What is the "Debian Private Mailing List"?
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or any other alias pointi
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:35:28 +1000, Anthony Towns said:
> (Followups to -vote)
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> The primary reason for this is that the existing messages were sent
>> to debian-private with an expectation of privacy.
> As Matthew pointed out in
My biggest problem with all this is that it's gonna mean a lot of work -
for the 'declassifying team' and for people who want to be bothered
about commenting on the process is respect of particular email. Thats
time that I feel could be better spent.
I do understand the motives...
--
Paul
On Thu
8 matches
Mail list logo
