On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:17:24PM -0500,
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the
> documentation under the exact same license as the program was always
> the right thing to do.
I agree.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:34:46AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > It saves *so* much trouble.
>
> But not all documentation is attached to a software. For instance, if
> I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under
> the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do.
Not
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:08:23PM +0100,
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
> > I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under
> > the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do.
>
> Not if you want it to be part of Debian.
It still
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But not all documentation is attached to a software. For instance, if
> I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under
> the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do.
It's reasonable if you want to attach adverts to it and allow others
On 1/5/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > But not all documentation is attached to a software. For instance, if
> > I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under
> > the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do.
>
> It's reasona
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:15:18PM -0500, Alexander (Sasha) Wait wrote:
> It's really sad to see blood boil over these licenses. Since I am
> talking to people at FSF & CC regularly, I would be more than happy to
> bring Debian concerns to both groups in a, hopefuly, productive
> fashion.If th
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:37:32AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > [3] http://wiki.debian.org/GFDLPositionStatement
> That page says it is immutable.
You need to log in.
Cheers,
aj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:02:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> It's based on Manoj's draft position statement [2] with some notable
> changes (an explicit "why not just say docs != software" section, a
> "how can this be fixed" section, a "what is the GFDL?" section, and
> reordering the major pr
8 matches
Mail list logo