Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:45:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:26 -0500, Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So let's start again. Let's say that someone tried put forward a new amendment in place of the old. This amendment makes clear its intention

For those who care about the GR

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:26:12 +1000, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au said: Why should it be a separate GR? That's seems both unnecessary and a bad idea; what's the point in overriding decisions about the GFDL, if it is then declared non-free anyway? Well, here is one view of how