On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:45:40AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Hereby I am proposing an amendment to the GR about GFDL opened by
Anthony Towns [Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:02:04 +1000]
I wish to thank everybody who will support this amendment, especially
I wish to thank those who second it.
I
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:29:38AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:45:40AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
(2) The Invariant Sections - Main Objection Against GFDL
[...]
This argument has been brought up a number of times already, but it does
not hold.
no, it holds
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 12:09:55AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:29:38AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:45:40AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
(2) The Invariant Sections - Main Objection Against GFDL
[...]
This argument has been brought
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 05:13:26PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 12:09:55AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:29:38AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:45:40AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
(2) The Invariant Sections -
ma, 2006-01-30 kello 09:24 +1100, Craig Sanders kirjoitti:
only indirectly. the real point, which you missed, was to be an accurate
description of reality - something that, as an extremist nutcase, you
are challenged by.
[ further insults deleted ]
Craig, could you please behave in a polite
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:37:05AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2006-01-30 kello 09:24 +1100, Craig Sanders kirjoitti:
only indirectly. the real point, which you missed, was to be an accurate
description of reality - something that, as an extremist nutcase, you
are challenged by.
[
6 matches
Mail list logo
