-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
[ 4 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
[ 1 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free
[ 3 ] Choice 3: GFDL-licensed works are com
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:01:36AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:45:35PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > You write in your platform that
> > -- I am independent, so I will be able to represent all the developers.
> > What is it that you're independent
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
> > packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
> > regular basis, they normally are not release
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> The DPL is described as a representative of Debian to the general
> public, and as a vision-definer inside the Debian Project.
I wouldn't say "vision-definer" -- the DPL lead's discussion, and may
summarise it afterwards, but act
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:01:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> (Please treat this question as if it were asked on debian-devel not
> here.)
(Not really sure what difference that makes)
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I do think it would be interesting for the project to embrace the d-i beta
> > releases
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
> part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
As a student, I'm reasonable flexible in hours to spend on whatever I
like. But well, if
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:27:03PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> If you were not running for DPL, which of the other candiates would you
> most likely vote for (or since you are running, rank as '2' on your
> ballot)? Why?
I'm not going to say that, my ballot remains private (except for th
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:16:48AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> There was no contact address for the DPL-team, or atleast none
> that I know off, so it's rather hard to ask them. The only
> available address that I know of is [EMAIL PROTECTED] And as
> far as I know, there wasn't even an official
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello Enrico,
>
> > But there's more than that. In the last year as part of the DPL Team,
> > people have been criticising the last year for the lack of reports. But
> > I don't remember a single one sending in a mail like "Dear
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> During DPL campaigning, it seems "in" for candidates to propose all
> sorts of Great Things they will try to do once elected. While this is
> obviously all interesting information, it leaves out something that, I
> think, is also fa
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
> lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
> years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
> long, is asking
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:09:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Presumably the decryption key could be unlocked after the election
> > and placed alongside the balots; since it should expire and be
> > revoked after the completion of the vote, this sho
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Many people consider the aggressive, often unconstructive atmosphere on
> major Debian mailing lists to be a problem. You only need to make a
> little spark and suddenly you have ignited a huge thread, up to several
> hundred mails p
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
> packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
> regular basis, they normally are not released "roughly two months after
> the las
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:09:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I guess the decryption key for encrypted ballots would be of some
> > issue, but that's about it.
> Presumably the decryption key could be unlocked after the election and
> placed alongside the balots; since it should expire and be
> > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > >Just a small question:
> > >Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
> > >part of your debian work would get lower priorities if you get elected?
> > >Or are you planning to toss out your TV, dump y
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi DPL candidates
>
> Would you also try to reach the goals mentioned in your platform if you
> wouldn't be elected DPL?
Yes. I'll possibly offer my services to the elected DPL to help
achieving the goals the elected DPL and myself shar
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:45:35PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> You write in your platform that
>
> -- I am independent, so I will be able to represent all the developers.
>
> What is it that you're independent from that other candidates aren't, and
> how exactly does independen
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Heya,
>
> Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
> lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
> years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
> long
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060306 14:58]:
> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 01:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Uh, for one thing, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" != "DPL Team".
>
> Maybe it would have been a good idea then to publicize a point of
> contact for your team. You did not, therefore I think
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 01:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Uh, for one thing, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" != "DPL Team".
Maybe it would have been a good idea then to publicize a point of
contact for your team. You did not, therefore I think Enrico is wrongly
annoyed by the lack of input to the team.
I d
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-03 10:05:31]:
> It is well known that you are the Debconf magician, and that without
> your work, Debconfs would either not happen or be a complete fiasco
> compared to the Debconfs we are used to by now.
gee, thanks. (c:
> So, if you are elect
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
>What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
>lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
>be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
>particular case foll
Hello,
those questions are for Andreas only: twice in your platform you say
"I can work full-time as DPL".
Why can you make that claim ?
If you any have any special arrangements to have free time for Debian, is that
conditioned to your election or will you benefit from those even if you're
not
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:48:55AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-06 01:39:52]:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> >Hi!
>>
>> Hi Sune!
>>
>> >Just a small question:
>> >
>> >Do all of you have many spare hours in yo
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:59:34PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:05:04AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin.
>
> > I'm not sure that I understand the reasons why the efforts couldn't be
> > reported, at least to debian-private. Are they one or more of the
> > fo
* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-06 01:39:52]:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >Hi!
>
> Hi Sune!
>
> >Just a small question:
> >
> >Do all of you have many spare hours in your current schedules? Or what
> >part of your debian work would get lower pr
27 matches
Mail list logo
