[Ivan Kohler]
We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
community. We will place their interests first in our priorities.
Currently GFDL is a license acknowledged as free by the great mass of
the members of the free software community and as a result it is
[Ted Walther]
Steve, you've had a day or two to answer this.
Ted, you've had days or weeks to answer dozens of questions posed to
all the candidates on this very mailing list. Including the one that
started this thread.
I could be wrong, but I don't believe you've answered _any_ of these in
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
There are a few reasons to dislike the DPL team concept without going
it alone; such as the liklihood of formal membership making it difficult
for non-members to contribute in the same way members do, or the way that
making the team be an issue at
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Now my question:
1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
openly?
2.) Would you
Bill Allombert wrote:
Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
developers accessible port machines with separate accounts. As an
aside, I think there should be more developers-accessible port machines.
Why?
Having two developers-accessible port
Hi there,
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:41:42AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it'd be particularly well-recieved if someone who, after
all, was not elected, would assume leadership. Regardless of the
constitutional issues, it was clear that
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Part of the effords to determine what option there were I asked
Anthony Towns if he could take the lead in the ftp-master team.
What you in fact said, amongst other things, was:
| stockholm so, in summary, can i conclude that you are not really
|
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:45:44AM +0100, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Do you think Debian should *officially* limit the number of delegations
for one person?
No, there is no useful limit, if anything, it should be case-by-case.
Do you consider this multiple hat question a problem?
Not on
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
[...]
Please see the bottom of [1] for my opinion.
--Jeroen
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00211.html
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
* Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
(even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
compelled to ask: who would?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:39:20PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Last November, [Andreas] and the DPL team wanted to propose a GR that
would have forcibly made everyone in a position of authority a formal
delegate, and stated that you had replacements ready if they were
unwilling to comply.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:26:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
... [Few of the people who
have applied the GFDL to their work have even done so with a full
knowledge of what the licence entails... take for example the
surprising number of manuals with every section marked as invariant.]
I don't
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:05:06AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-10 23:23:52]:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not ask Joeren for obvious reasons.
What were those obvious reasons? You and Branden stood against each
other
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
(even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
compelled to ask: who would?
It's a statement that I will
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:26:47PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
At that time I emphazised several times that replacing the teams
was only the very last, desperate option, which we were trying to
avoid but for completeness sake had considered along with a
variety of less drastical
* James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-11 14:02:49]:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Part of the effords to determine what option there were I asked
Anthony Towns if he could take the lead in the ftp-master team.
What you in fact said, amongst other things, was:
|
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
I don't think that's limited to the GFDL. I'm sure that a large amount
of code is placed under the GPL/LGPL/Artistic/MPL/etc./ad-nauseum
without the author necessarily understanding all the details of the
chosen license.
My favorite is the amap author, who created
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
I admit I haven't read the platforms as thoroughly as I should've, so
forgive if it was covered...
IIRC nobody talked about SPI in their platform. Is SPI important for
Debian? What is Debian's current relationship with SPI, and should it be
different?
thanks
-- vbi
--
featured link:
Again: sorry if I didn't see it on your platforms
Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your real
life ($WORKPLACE, whatever)? I would be happy if the candidates would
state possibly 'dangerous' allegiance[1] now, upfront, and not only if they
come up because some
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
You were very busy and I knew you and joey had issues and a hard
time working together. In the same IRC conversation I first asked
Anthony about his working relationship with Joey. He would have
been an excellent contact point inside FTP-master to work with
him on e.g.
Hi,
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060311 20:48]:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
Well, there are two parts of the answer.
* Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-11 22:06:31]:
Again: sorry if I didn't see it on your platforms
Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your real
life ($WORKPLACE, whatever)?
My wife thinks I work too much and my three year old son would
like to play
Hi,
At the end of voting, with 428 Ballots resulting in 390 votes
from 369 developers, GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable
sections are free has carried the day.
Statistics about this vote are at:
http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/gr_gfdl/
The list of voters
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
See also
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I will delegate only people if they are ready for
it. As some example, if e.g. the policy team asks me to extend
themself by someone, I will (usually) do as requested.
If this is the case, why were you supporting a motion to forcibly
Benjamin Seidenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say (said, saying, says):
2. To express in words: Say what's on your mind.
3. a. To state as one's opinion or judgment; declare: I say let's eat out.
b. To state as a determination of fact: It's hard to say who is
right in this matter..
Murdock Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to debate grand ideas: What role should
socio-religious views play in the Debian project?
Would using differences in beliefs about death
as a motive to call for expulsion (as threatened in
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:44:28AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Murdock Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to debate grand ideas: What role should socio-religious
views play in the Debian project? Would using differences in beliefs
about death as a motive to call for expulsion (as
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I never personally replied to Joey's mail about the next point
release explicitly saying that fixing sudo was a pre-depends, and I
apologise for that.
You're not a DPL candidate, and if this question is relevant at all,
it's relevant to DPL
Ted Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the other DPL candidates, especially Steve McIntyre who has been
pussy-footing around this issue, should stand forward and say clearly
where they stand on the issue of expelling developers; what is a just
case for expulsion? Be really clear and
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
If I can only pick the things
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
Yeah, I'm with you!
Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
being 100% fun, and what the DPL can do to help them?
I'm
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
If I can only pick the things that're directly achievable, I'll just
go with getting the momentum back -- ie, doing cool things quickly and
regularly, no matter what they are.
What are some of the organizational or institutional factors which you
su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
Why -project and not -devel-announce?
--
Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy. Love the Policy. Obey the
Policy.
--
To
36 matches
Mail list logo
