su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
> if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
> details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
Why -project and not -devel-announce?
--
Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy. Love the Policy. Obey the
Policy.
--
To UNSUBS
Anthony Towns writes:
> If I can only pick the things that're directly achievable, I'll just
> go with getting the momentum back -- ie, doing cool things quickly and
> regularly, no matter what they are.
What are some of the organizational or institutional factors which you
think keep us from do
Anthony Towns writes:
> If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
> for everyone involved.
Yeah, I'm with you!
Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
being 100% fun, and what the DPL can do to help them?
I'm interested here both in ans
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
If I can only pick the things
Ted Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the other DPL candidates, especially Steve McIntyre who has been
> pussy-footing around this issue, should stand forward and say clearly
> where they stand on the issue of expelling developers; what is a just
> case for expulsion? Be really clear
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I never personally replied to Joey's mail about the next point
> release explicitly saying that fixing sudo was a pre-depends, and I
> apologise for that.
You're not a DPL candidate, and if this question is relevant at all,
it's relevant to DPL candid
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:44:28AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Murdock Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to debate grand ideas: What role should socio-religious
views play in the Debian project? Would using differences in beliefs
about death as a motive to call for expulsion (as thre
Murdock Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to debate grand ideas: What role should
> socio-religious views play in the Debian project?
> Would using differences in beliefs about death
> as a motive to call for expulsion (as threatened in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg
Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say (said, saying, says):
> 2. To express in words: Say what's on your mind.
> 3. a. To state as one's opinion or judgment; declare: I say let's eat out.
> b. To state as a determination of fact: It's hard to say who is
> right in this matter..
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, I will delegate only people if they are ready for
> it. As some example, if e.g. the policy team asks me to extend
> themself by someone, I will (usually) do as requested.
If this is the case, why were you supporting a motion to forcibl
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
See also http://lists.debian.org/de
Hi,
At the end of voting, with 428 Ballots resulting in 390 votes
from 369 developers, "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable
sections are free" has carried the day.
Statistics about this vote are at:
http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/gr_gfdl/
The list of voters
* Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 22:06:31]:
> Again: sorry if I didn't see it on your platforms
>
> Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your "real
> life" ($WORKPLACE, whatever)?
My wife thinks I work too much and my three year old son would
like to
Hi,
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060311 20:48]:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
Well, there are two parts of the answer.
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> You were very busy and I knew you and joey had issues and a hard
> time working together. In the same IRC conversation I first asked
> Anthony about his working relationship with Joey. He would have
> been an excellent contact point inside FTP-master to work with
> him on
Again: sorry if I didn't see it on your platforms
Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your "real
life" ($WORKPLACE, whatever)? I would be happy if the candidates would
state possibly 'dangerous' allegiance[1] now, upfront, and not only if they
come up because some actu
I admit I haven't read the platforms as thoroughly as I should've, so
forgive if it was covered...
IIRC nobody talked about SPI in their platform. Is SPI important for
Debian? What is Debian's current relationship with SPI, and should it be
different?
thanks
-- vbi
--
featured link: http:/
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
I don't think that's limited to the GFDL. I'm sure that a large amount
of code is placed under the GPL/LGPL/Artistic/MPL/etc./ad-nauseum
without the author necessarily understanding all the details of the
chosen license.
My favorite is the amap author, who created addition
* James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 14:02:49]:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Part of the effords to determine what option there were I asked
> > Anthony Towns if he could take the lead in the ftp-master team.
>
> What you in fact said, amongst other things, was:
>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:26:47PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > > At that time I emphazised several times that replacing the teams
> > > was only the very last, desperate option, which we were trying to
> > > avoid but for completeness sake had considered along with a
> > > variety of less d
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
>
> > (even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
>
> Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
> compelled to ask: who would?
It's a statement that I
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:05:06AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-10 23:23:52]:
> > Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I did not ask Joeren for obvious reasons.
> > What were those obvious reasons? You and Branden stood against each
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:26:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>... [Few of the people who
>have applied the GFDL to their work have even done so with a full
>knowledge of what the licence entails... take for example the
>surprising number of manuals with every section marked as invariant.]
I don'
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:39:20PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Last November, [Andreas] and the DPL team wanted to propose a GR that
> would have forcibly made everyone in a position of authority a formal
> delegate, and stated that you had replacements ready if they were
> unwilling to comply
* Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
> (even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
compelled to ask: who would?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
D
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
> [...]
Please see the bottom of [1] for my opinion.
--Jeroen
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00211.html
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:45:44AM +0100, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> Do you think Debian should *officially* limit the number of delegations
> for one person?
No, there is no useful limit, if anything, it should be case-by-case.
> Do you consider this "multiple hat" question a problem?
No
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Part of the effords to determine what option there were I asked
> Anthony Towns if he could take the lead in the ftp-master team.
What you in fact said, amongst other things, was:
| so, in summary, can i conclude that you are not really
|
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:41:42AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think it'd be particularly well-recieved if someone who, after
> > all, was not elected, would assume leadership. Regardless of the
> > constitutional issues, it was cl
Hi there,
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
signatu
Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
> > > developers accessible port machines with separate accounts. As an
> > > aside, I think there should be more developers-accessible port machines.
> >
> > Why?
>
> Having two developers-accessi
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > Now my question:
> > >
> > > 1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
> > > openly?
> > >
> >
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There are a few reasons to dislike the "DPL team" concept without going
> it alone; such as the liklihood of formal membership making it difficult
> for non-members to contribute in the same way members do, or the way that
> making the team be an issue at
[Ted Walther]
> Steve, you've had a day or two to answer this.
Ted, you've had days or weeks to answer dozens of questions posed to
"all the candidates" on this very mailing list. Including the one that
started this thread.
I could be wrong, but I don't believe you've answered _any_ of these in
[Ivan Kohler]
> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
> community. We will place their interests first in our priorities.
> Currently GFDL is a license acknowledged as free by the great mass of
> the members of the free software community and as a result it i
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.11.0010 +0100]:
> > > > It didn't have.
> > > >
> > > > The changes were underway and in discussion independently.
> > >
> > > Not trying to pick on anyone here, but the DPL team came into play
> > > and I sparked th
37 matches
Mail list logo