-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Delete the following text from the resolution:
- - it is still possible to distribute the source code and compiled
- - code together on at least one machine-readable medium."
and replace it with:
+ it is still possible to di
Le vendredi 07 avril 2006 à 10:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Delete the following text from the resolution:
>
> - - it is still possible to distribute the source code and compiled
> - - code together on at least one machine-readable medium."
>
> and replace it with:
>
>
Le vendredi 07 avril 2006 à 00:20 +0200, Jacobo Tarrio a écrit :
> > > Well, no. If the author makes that promise, we may just as well wait
> > > until
> > > that happens and the package is free. It's not like we've run out of
> > > software to package :-)
> > Now, please re-read Manoj's email an
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:04:35AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> After the vote of GR 2006-001, we end up with an unclear situation about
> the GNU Free Documentation License. While documents using this license
> are considered free provided they don't use invariant sections, the DFSG
> don't co
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:04:35AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > At the end of DFSG #2, the following text should be added:
> > "The license may restrict distribution to some kinds of media if
> > it is still possible to distribute the sourc
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This formulation is better in one sense, as it avoids licenses being too
> restrictive. However it tangles the DFSG with the current media we are
> distributing our packages on, and I don't like that much.
It seems likely that we will have an online archive a
I'm not a cryptographer so I could be way off here. Could there be a
problem with using the MD5 hash in the tally sheet? My concern is purely
theoretic and I have absolutely no reason to doubt the secretary!
When I submit my vote (for DPL elections) I receive a confirmation email
with a moniker o
7 matches
Mail list logo
