On 4/11/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > I was not convinced by this "rebuttal".
>
> Nevertheless, neither of us would be made happy by a detailed
> repeat of it on -vote. You'd remain unconvinced and I'd be
> annoyed by the lost time.
Your comment, here, does not agr
Raul Miller wrote:
> I was not convinced by this "rebuttal".
Nevertheless, neither of us would be made happy by a detailed
repeat of it on -vote. You'd remain unconvinced and I'd be
annoyed by the lost time.
> Furthermore, I'm not sure what issue(s) you feel references are needed
> on.
The draft
2 matches
Mail list logo
