Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The only compromise I can see is a new archive section different from
> main, contrib or non-free which will be considered part of Debian and
> distributed on our CD and netboot images.
Like, say, 'restricted'?
--
Gruesse/gre
Anthony Towns wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:11:02PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
>> Changes for the current draft:
>> > + In case the DPL and ex-secretary can't agree on an candidate for new
>> > secretary, the decision is made by the developers in a GR, and not by
>> > the SPI board.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:01:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> He has full control of it, in the sense that it is often binary only, and that
> he produces it, and not some third party (like the operating system vendor).
> Also, i believe that modifying the firmware, like you propose, usually voids
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:01:05AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:22:08 +1000, Anthony Towns
> said:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Yet another draft. There are major changes in this version, so I
> >> think we'll need to have
4 matches
Mail list logo