Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

2006-10-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:42:36PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Martin Zobel-Helas] >> I don't see the reason here to reduce the time of the voting >> period. I understand "immediate vote" as per constitution as >> "voting without prior discussion period". >> Please give a reasonable argumen

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

2006-10-28 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > The technical committee charter and the policy process both adopt > > the principle that the people making the change [..] only act in an > > editorial capacity -- reviewing changes and committing them > > appropriately, but not

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Loïc Minier
Where's the vote.debian.org page? -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:08:05 +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Where's the vote.debian.org page? It shall be put up when someone has time for it. The proposers have not yet provided the wml for the vote page, nor their idea of the ballot; I have a monday deadline, and th

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

2006-10-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:23:33 +1000, Anthony Towns said: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> > The technical committee charter and the policy process both adopt >> > the principle that the people making the change [..] only act in >> > an editorial capacity --