Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:20:24PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > > Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens
> > > > to
>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > > Uh, what's this if not peer review?
> > > It's not peer review when we discuss it later and no
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:20:24PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens to
> > > the DPL, not the project?
> >
> > I'll extract the e
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens to
> > the DPL, not the project?
>
> I'll extract the exact line from the above text for you:
> ... state the SPI Board's c
Neil McGovern writes ("Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only
uploads"):
> I'll extract the exact line from the above text for you:
> ... state the SPI Board's current understanding of who is authorised to
> act for the project ...
>
> In this case, the DPL.
Nonsense. If we we
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > Uh, what's this if not peer review?
> > It's not peer review when we discuss it later and none of us (including
> > you) have any power to do anything about it, exc
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:45:06AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > >> > I don't imagine Aurelien's any less upset, but as far as I can see,
> > >> > there
> > >> > aren't actual problems with the way arm's keeping up at present:
> > >>
> > >> Another problem is that the bui
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:18:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:56:36AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > This is a two-way street though. Aurelien was trying to solve a problem
> > he perceived to exist with the arm port. His solution has been rejected,
> > but is the or
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > What says SPI only listens to the DPL, not the project? AIUI, the DPL
> > > is appointed as an adviser to SPI's board, not a veto.
>
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 01:05:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 01:24:21AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > One thing that strikes me is that in all of the emails so far,
> > > everyone is ignoring that this whole thing started because Aurelien
> > > decided to start aut
Frank Küster wrote:
> >> > I don't imagine Aurelien's any less upset, but as far as I can see, there
> >> > aren't actual problems with the way arm's keeping up at present:
> >>
> >> Another problem is that the buildd email mailbox is apparently piped to
> >> /dev/null.
> >
> > FWIW, buildd mail i
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> > ] I am really upset by the way the ARM build daemons are managed. The
>> > ] packages are not uploaded regularly, with sometimes three days between
>> > ] two uploads. [...]
>> > ]
>> > ] All of that resulted in ARM being the s
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > ] I am really upset by the way the ARM build daemons are managed. The
> > ] packages are not uploaded regularly, with sometimes three days between
> > ] two uploads. [...]
> > ]
> > ] All of that resulted in ARM being the slowest architecture to build
> > ] packages. [...]
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Uh, what's this if not peer review?
> It's not peer review when we discuss it later and none of us (including
> you) have any power to do anything about it, except via long drawn-out
> political processes.
Err, I could change it r
14 matches
Mail list logo
