Dear Colleague,
SAWN 2005 submission is now closed. For further details on the
workshop program please see http://dna.engr.uconn.edu/SAWN2005/
SAWN 2005 Organizers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 15:59 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Flamewars are actually fun, when done properly.
>
> > "Having fun in a flamewar" is not the kind of fun we need to seek.
> > Because there's no reward for the project, only some self-satisf
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> IMHO things like this could have been avoided by having a proper team
> behind [EMAIL PROTECTED] and those both mailing lists which is at least 4
> persons.
>
> How do you plan help the press team out here? Do you think a delegation
> of one perso
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> 1) Can you tell us a few of the most important mistakes you have made during
> these past two years with regard to debian ?
I am aware of no technical mistake that had important consequences and
was not quickly fixed.
My obvious social mistake
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> but after that, I didn't find another search result until he mentioned
> the 2007 marketing campaign. Is this the sort of "fire and forget"
> reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL?
>
> How would other candidates avoid dropping top
From the debate:
09:32 Anthony: What was your biggest triumph over the
past 12 months? Your biggest mistake?
09:34 the thing that pleased me the most was all the things
getting freed -- the new GFDL drafts, the new
creative commons
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:11:47AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Anthony Towns
> > [...] there are plenty of journos interested in Debian who are
> > happy to talk to developers directly if they've got something newsworthy,
> > and we've all got the ability to start our own website or mailing list
> > wi
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:11:06PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 05:40:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> As of kFreeBSD:
> > a. kfreebsd -- easy!
> > i. add it to the archive!
> > - straight after etch rel
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Should porters be required to NMU? I would hope not in this quantity as
> someone who NMU's should consider themselves a virtual maintainer until
> the next upload (or at least I've read this a few times from people such
> as aj?
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:04:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Which release-critical bug will each of you fix in order to convince me to
> vote for you? :)
#411953
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:37:17PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
>IMHO things like this could have been avoided by having a proper team
>behind [EMAIL PROTECTED] and those both mailing lists which is at least 4
>persons.
>
>How do you plan help the press team out here? Do you think a delegatio
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:47:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> As I'm sure you're aware, there is no cabal; there's only a bunch of
> people who put in massive amounts of time and get the blame when
> important stuff is delayed. And as any sysadmin will tell you, *every*
> request is important.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
>that sounds to me like you wanted to continue with "but you cant
>do that???as they are all volunteers and you cant push them" or so.
>could you elaborate? were you in the position to push people to
>do something in debian, and ho
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> "The Google Summer of Code[0] is over, and final reports have been
> submitted. Most of our students worked well right up to (and in some
> cases beyond) the end of the summer, and hopefully we'll see some
> useful results from their p
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:48:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>Hi all,
>IANADD, so I don't have vote right, but I'd like to ask a question
>anyway.
>
>To all candidates who wish to respond:
>
> How did you vote for the GR on the GFDL[1] (GR-2006-001) and why?
> In case you didn't vote, could yo
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:17:59PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
>
>Please brag about RC bugs you have fixed since sarge's
>release, excluding bugs in your own packages. Of
>interest are both the quantity and intractability of the
>bugs. If you have not fixed RC bugs but have made
>another note
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:59:23AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We all know from experience (and this is not specific to Debian) that
>the persons that get elected do not distribute their actions over the
>term of office regularly. They are usually active just after they get
>elected, then
Le vendredi 16 mars 2007 à 10:27 +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> It's sort of disappointing how much less trouble I've had since adding such
> disclaimers to the end of emails containing jokes. There seem to be far too
> many starched attitudes around.
Ah, thanks. I was looking for a translation of the
Anthony Towns
> [...] there are plenty of journos interested in Debian who are
> happy to talk to developers directly if they've got something newsworthy,
> and we've all got the ability to start our own website or mailing list
> with global reach -- the only thing we need to do is build a reputat
Anthony Towns wrote:
> In general, if someone else is in charge of something -- like Joey
> and press stuff -- and you don't want to work with them, I think
> it's better to do things independently rather than fight over the
> infrastructure.
I think this attitude is exactly what causes the inf
20 matches
Mail list logo
