Re: Question for all candidates, was: Google SoC 2007 - we're in, sign up quickly!

Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, your arbitrary dislike of Google is well-enough known > already; it has no place in this forum. Apparently it's not well-enough known that it's not arbitrary, but actually based on their irritating bugs and misbehaviour! Also, maybe some d

Re: Question for Gustavo and Sam: bringing back the fun

Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > Flamewars are good if the discussions are based on facts. Lately most > flamewars in Debian were on opinions, not on facts. I think it would be useful if we only used the term "flamewar" for threads that contain actual flaming. The current alternate usage of "flamewar" for

dunc-tank, expulsion fests

Hello, these are questions for all candidates. I was unable to distill the answers from your platforms and the last six or seven weeks of -vote (pointers to past unmistakable statements that I've overlooked are fine by me): 1. Would you support/continue/expand this dunc-tank experiment? If so, w

Re: dunc-tank, expulsion fests

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hello, > > these are questions for all candidates. too late, the campaign is over pal. > I was unable to distill the > answers from your platforms and the last six or seven weeks of -vote > (pointers to past unmistakable statem

Re: dunc-tank, expulsion fests

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > these are questions for all candidates. > > too late, the campaign is over pal. I responded to Toni privately. Other candidates can do so as well. (This is not a