On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Seriously, could we have this change without voting?
Indeed. Reducing our GR rate seems more important than changing the DPL
election process.
I don't agree. I think quite the
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Seriously, could we have this change without voting?
Indeed. Reducing our GR rate seems more important than
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070804 11:54]:
GRs do not unite, they divide. They divide the DDs in two: the one
the losers and the winners. And the identity you claim to forge, is just
the identity of the winning camp, not Debian's.
Of course, with exceptions like formal GRs, e.g.
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I don't agree. I think quite the contrary. We often tend to not address
issues and let them consume our energy in endless discussions. I believe
that having GR is useful to re-forge
On su, 2007-08-05 at 01:07 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
GRs do not unite, they divide. They divide the DDs in two: the one
the losers and the winners.
Just because your argument doesn't win the day doesn't mean you're a
Hi,
The resolution passes, with 386 votes from 345 developers.
pgpPy3V1mTWdv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Starting results calculation at Sun Aug 5 00:01:21 2007
Option 1 Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col
6 matches
Mail list logo
