Re: Results for General Resolution: Endorse concept of Debian maintainers

2007-08-05 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 19:54:00 -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > Hi, > > The resolution passes, with 386 votes from 345 developers. > > The winners are: >Option 1 "Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers" > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

2007-08-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since this mail, I've asked Martin Michlmayr, Wichert Akkerman, Bdale > Garbee and Branden Robinson about their opinion regarding this post; and > we've also seen replies from Sam Hocevar and Anthony Towns. Some have > replied on-list, others only thro

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

2007-08-05 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:58:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too > short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and > can't do all that much when the next election is about to turn up for > fear of being

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

2007-08-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 12:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > That's because you only take into account controversial GR. Not all GR > need to be controversial. Sometimes I'm tempted to use GRs to try have some > official position statements from Debian on some topics. And this is what GRs are