On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wordpress;dist=stable
> shows zero RC bugs, and I found two DSA-s for it, 1258 and 1502.
> The remaining filed bugs which relate to security are explicitly marked by
> the
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:51:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > And if so, what is the plan for wordpress in etch and lenny?
>
> I recommend to drop it from Lenny, but if people choose to
> repeat mistakes I won't waste my time on argueing.
I don't quite see the point of this...
http://b
Hi,
On Friday 04 April 2008 08:12, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Thanks for clarifying. Sounds sensible to me, but then I think we should
> > also drop wordpress from etch.
> What would that help?
a.) it would be a clear statement, that we drop support for it. Currently it's
wishi-washi.
b.) people
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 06:26:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wordpress;dist=stable
> > shows zero RC bugs, and I found two DSA-s for it, 1258 and 1502.
> > The remaining
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:10:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I do agree with Ian, however, that the tech-ctte is one of the worst
> examples for limiting hats for a slightly different reason: the tech-ctte
> needs to make decisions for the project that the project can then
> implement. Yes, thi
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:10:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I do agree with Ian, however, that the tech-ctte is one of the worst
> examples for limiting hats for a slightly different reason: the tech-ctte
> needs to make decisions for the project that the project can then
> implement. Yes, thi
2008/3/30, Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE DEBIAN PROJECT LEADER ELECTION 2008
>= === = === === == === ==
>
> Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, March 30th, 2008
> Votes mus
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:10:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I do agree with Ian, however, that the tech-ctte is one of the worst
>> examples for limiting hats for a slightly different reason: the
>> tech-ctte needs to make decisions for the project th
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:10:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I do agree with Ian, however, that the tech-ctte is one of the worst
>> examples for limiting hats for a slightly different reason: the
>> tech-ctte needs to make decisions for the project th
9 matches
Mail list logo
