On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then
we only had less than one third the number of developers. Yes,
shortening the voting period has been such a *fun* experiment.
I think that using
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:46:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:44:12 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But I see how it would help if the CFV was more verbose about that,
and less verbose about other things. It goes on and on about the
technicalities of
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:40:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If you think the vote period is too short, then I suppose there
is the option to see if other
people consider it so too, and see if you can redo some of the
constitutional amendment that was passed by acclaim last
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:44:09 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Huh. Looking at the ballot: , | ... | Do not erase anything
between the lines below and do not change the | choice names.
Yes, you see, that's the point - the text just starts talking about
not erasing something.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:51:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I propose that you make the beginning look like this:
HOW TO VOTE
First, read the full text of [...variable data...]
The ballot is a small text form that is included below. It is cast
by sending a filled out and
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.04.2008, 12:39 +0200 schrieb Frank S. Thomas:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 12:17, Nico Golde wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- d81e16a2-03b6-4340-84f2-51de89b8185e
[XXX] Choice 1: Steve McIntyre
[XXX]
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then we
only had less than one third the number of developers. Yes,
shortening the
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then we
only had less than one third the number of developers.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then we
only
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:12:20PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Can you present a sample ballot for, say, DPL election 2009? It
might help to see a full ballot and compare the points of difference.
Will do (in another mail).
Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it. (I
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 23:45 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Suggesting to vote for Choice 2: John Doe 2 ? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:58:34 +0200, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You can express your opinions on this list without any problem, though
your opinion should not be expressed in an official reminder to vote
Why not? I hold these opinions about the processes I am
following as a
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:25:19 +0100, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When you send an email with From set to Debian Project Secretary,
you are supposed to cater to the opinion of the community, which was
No, I am not. The opinions of the community have little to do
with the
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:42:05 +0200, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Also wondering, since Nico’s replies were signed: Would it have been
possible to redirect his reply to the voting address and thus change
his vote? If done with the right timing, he might not have a chance to
react
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:12:20 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
people just want to know about the part they have to send back
in. Whether you call this the ballot or the part of the ballot you
have edit in order to
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If ever I were to even consider basing my actions on your
judgement, I will take this under advisement. I have never been one
for a robotic secretary. Indeed, every CFV past the first one has some
commentary on how
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:14:06 +0100, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If ever I were to even consider basing my actions on your judgement,
I will take this under advisement. I have never been one for a
robotic secretary.
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:45:55 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it. (I also
couldn't find the references to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CFVs. Should
there be some?)
I guess. It seemed pointless before, since you already have
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:25:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
b) move the address to send the ballot to up front, where we mention
it.
Good idea, and it can't hurt to repeat it.
Maybe also warn against group-replies? I personally think that we should
discourage such public voting, but
On Sunday 13 April 2008 16:25:40 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is
in the Debian keyring. The voting software (Devotee) accepts mail that
either contains only an unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440 compliant),
or a PGP/MIME mail
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:59:03PM -0500]:
Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
people just want to know about the part they have to send back
in. Whether you call this the ballot or the part of the ballot you
have edit in order to vote,
Hi,
OK, another draft, now incorporating the last two
suggestions. I added a mention of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] location.
Now, GR votes have different wording: the full text of the
GR and amendments is included if it is short, or a pointer is put in
for the vote page
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:58:34 +0200, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You can express your opinions on this list without any problem, though
your opinion should not be expressed in an official reminder to vote
Why not? I hold these opinions about the
23 matches
Mail list logo
