Le Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:34:14PM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
>
> The main question is: does the project think DAM should be allowed to
> start implementing the proposal posted to d-d-a, or should the project as
> a whole decide on the future direction of the NM process and related
> processes.
On 02/11/08 at 22:34 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> The main question is: does the project think DAM should be allowed to
> start implementing the proposal posted to d-d-a, or should the project as
> a whole decide on the future direction of the NM process and related
> processes. IMO that issue is a
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
To be very blunt and direct: I think your a teensy, weeny bit late with
this. We're currently already working on an alternate proposal. And that
one has gotten a fairly big number of seconds. I really
Hi,
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers to postpone the implementation of the changes
| described on the
4 matches
Mail list logo
