First call for votes for the Lenny release GR

FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE Lenny Release General Resolution = === = === === = === === == Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, December 14th, 2008 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, December 21st, 2008 This ballot is for a v

Re: Bundled votes and the secretary

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:38:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [...], and frankly I see no reason that we as a project > should even honor the outcome of a vote on this ballot as presented. I think you meant to say "we as the Release Team". -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your da

Re: Bundled votes and the secretary

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:15:20PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I do not trust anymore the Secretary, and I do not trust sufficiently > the result of this vote. If the otherwise winning option is dismissed by > the lack of a 3:1 majority (for which the requirements are still “Manoj > said so

Re: Bundled votes and the secretary

* Julien BLACHE: >>> [ ] Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1] >> >> We're not changing the DFSG. So there's no need for 3:1. > > We're overriding it, so it requires 3:1, and it was the same for the > waiver for Etch. Are we? I mean, this stuff is already in the arch

Re: Final call for votes: GR: Project membership procedures

Hi, On Friday 12 December 2008 15:35, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Holger Levsen writes: > > On Friday 12 December 2008 12:57, Neil McGovern wrote: > >> ..Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired > >> choices, and ranked below all ranked choices... > "considered equally" means that tho