DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote: | Period | Start| End| |+--+| | Nomination | Sunday, March 1st, 2009 | Saterday, March 7th, 2009 | | Campaign | Sunday, March

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: 1.618: Yes, for some reason I've adopted irrational footnote numbering. Don't ask why.[2.718] Actually, no. As long as you are bound to write them in finite space using decimal notation, your footnotes still look like terribly

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread MJ Ray
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: People who'd like to help run the debate and/or collect questions can also volunteer with a message to -vote. I'd like to do either, as previous years. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote: | Period | Start| End| |+--+| | Nomination | Sunday, March

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: I'd like to raise the question of whether these IRC debates are really something we should have. I know Don and the panelists put a lot of time and effort into making the debates happen, which is part of why I ask the question: is it really worth all