Hi!
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
> Do you think Debian project has enough manpower to differ (if needed)
> with other major derivatives and major non-derivatives in the important
> non-Debian-specific software choices?
Probably, yes. But being different just for the sake of it is not
something
Since my thoughts have been pretty much summed up far better than I
could, I'd like to refer to Stefano's answers, as - apart from the
experience bits, as I obviously have no DPL experience - are very much
like my own would have been.
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:16:42
Thomas Goirand writes:
> "search[ing] for talent and passion" is a great goal, but just writing
> "The key to my goal is communication" isn't enough for me. So, how will
> you do?
I have a couple of ideas, including - but not limited to:
* As mentioned in a different thread, I'd love to get a
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:01:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > In some cases, of course, that isn't the case, and then things get
> > somewhat more complex. A good example on that is the systemd discussion
> > on -devel currently: making
On 03/17/2012 06:46 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:01:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>
>>> In some cases, of course, that isn't the case, and then things get
>>> somewhat more complex. A good example on that is the s
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On the paper of the Constitution, the Technical Committee is already all
> we need to "cover up" for cases where decision by consensus does not
> work (I'm specifically thinking at §6.1.1 "Deciding on any matter of
> technical policy" and §6.1.3 "Make a decision when
6 matches
Mail list logo
