Re: quantity of DPL candidates?

On 16/03/16 01:25, Ian Jackson wrote: > martin f krafft writes ("Re: quantity of DPL candidates?"): >> What sort of decision-making are we talking about? We require the >> DPL to sign off on expenses, but this could be solved with >> a (collaboratively generated) budget. What other decisions are

Re: quantity of DPL candidates?

Hi Paul, On 14/03/2016 03:53, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi Mehdi, > > Any thoughts on the low amount of DPL candidates this year? The only > year we have had a sole candidate was when zack ran for second-term > re-election in 2011, which is a quite different situation to this > one, where the

Re: quantity of DPL candidates?

martin f krafft writes ("Re: quantity of DPL candidates?"): > What sort of decision-making are we talking about? We require the > DPL to sign off on expenses, but this could be solved with > a (collaboratively generated) budget. What other decisions are in > the DPL realm? I don't mean the

Re: quantity of DPL candidates?

also sprach Ian Jackson [2016-03-15 17:26 +0100]: > I think it reflects the fact that being the DPL is an > unfortunately large commitment for a single person. > > There have been various proposals to replace the single DPL with > a board, which I think are a

Re: quantity of DPL candidates?

Paul Wise writes ("quantity of DPL candidates?"): > Any thoughts on the low amount of DPL candidates this year? The only > year we have had a sole candidate was when zack ran for second-term > re-election in 2011, which is a quite different situation to this one, > where the previous DPL is not