Martin,
On 29/03/2017 07:58, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Mehdi,
>
> In your platform you list "Ensuring the community remains safe and fun"
> as your first priority for the next term.
>
> I need to ask why you think in this term you will manage to do so, when
> I believe you failed to do so in the l
On 30/03/2017 16:14, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Q to the candidates: GPLv2 system library
> exception"):
>> On 29/03/2017 20:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Do you think this situation needs addressing? What do you propose do
>>> about it? Do you think the way the ZFS situation
On 30/03/2017 05:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> In your platform from last year [1], you discussed this Roadmap (I
> mistakenly recalled roadmaps, but you described it singularly).
>
> How is the Roadmap going? Is it defined? Where can I read about what's
> been accomplished? Is helping Debian an
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Do you think a HW Certification Process should be available for Debian ?
I note that some hardware vendors are asking for one, one example here:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/7cbc77de593a114587c3d1a3c385eaafb54...@mailbx03.quan
On 2017-03-30 15:39:00, Chris Lamb wrote:
> It seems to be an incredibly difficult skill to master and I cannot claim
> to have substantial prior experience. Perhaps it wasn't Zack-as-DPL that
> helped move those particular conversations along but rather Zack's mediation
> skills…? What do you thin
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Do you think a HW Certification Process should be available for Debian ?
[…]
> Should we have a Certification Test Suite
As Project Leader I would not stand in the way of anyone wishing to
work on this and can certainly see value to Debian if they existed.
However, at t
hello Chris,
Thank you for your response. Please see below some follow-ups.
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:56 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hello Ritesh,
>
> > Debian as a project is different than others. Most other similar projects,
> > have
> > a commercial backing and interest. This puts the onus on
Hello Ritesh,
> Debian as a project is different than others. Most other similar projects,
> have
> a commercial backing and interest. This puts the onus on them (other Linux
> distributions) to ensure their support infrastructure is simple, intuitive and
> supportable.
You raise some interestin
Hey Antoine,
> One thing I remember seeing Zack do fairly often in his time as a DPL
> was to intervene in certain threads to provide a summary and try to find
> a way out of difficult situations.
I've seen a number of DDs attempt this route. Some succeed but unfortunately
many fail or at least d
Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Q to the candidates: GPLv2 system library exception"):
> On 29/03/2017 20:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Do you think this situation needs addressing? What do you propose do
> > about it? Do you think the way the ZFS situation was resolved could
> > be an example?
>
> I
Enrico Zini writes ("Re: Q to both candidates: preventing burnout by other
contributors"):
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 07:19:31PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > However, I still think that by continually and reliably calling it out
> > in general, even in cases where it is unlikely to worsen, means th
Hi Chris,
Thank you for adressing those difficult questions, and thanks for
everyone who stepped up to bring them forward. This is probably one of
the most important discussions right now in the free software world (if
not in STEM overall)...
On 2017-03-29 19:19:31, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> 2. Do you
Hello DPL Candidates,
Thank you for standing for the DPL position.
Debian as a project is different than others. Most other similar projects, have
a commercial backing and interest. This puts the onus on them (other Linux
distributions) to ensure their support infrastructure is simple, intuitive
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Q to both candidates: preventing burnout by other
contributors"):
> [analysis of structural problem with toxic behaviours]
I agree entirely with your analysis.
> In Debian, we have very few tools short of outright explusion from the
> project, which obviously everyone i
14 matches
Mail list logo
