Re: Renaming the FTP Masters

2021-11-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 16314 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote: Wrong wrong wrong ... we're "project members" ... don't you remember? :) Just like AH is now CT. (Gosh, DMT TLA...) This shows that it will take years, if not decades, for the rename to ever be effective (if the person(s) in charge decide(s) it...).

Re: Draft GR for resolution process changes

2021-11-12 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Timo" == Timo Röhling writes: Timo> I must say I find your reasoning convincing. A certain Timo> stability of ballot options is desirable, and as our voting Timo> scheme does not suffer from spoiler effects, we can afford to Timo> keep the odd stale option. Besides, as you p

Re: Draft GR for resolution process changes

2021-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery writes: > This paragraph helped me realize that you see my proposal as a > substantive change over the current rules for the original GR proposer. > I hadn't entirely realized that it was, and I see that I missed some > subtlety in current rules, so I went back and reviewed them. I

Re: Draft GR for resolution process changes

2021-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > here are comments from my point of view in the hope of being useful, > please do not take them as objections; I know that you have looked at > the problem through many more angles than I did. By the way, sorry in > advance if what I write today has been already addressed

Re: Draft GR for resolution process changes

2021-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Thanks Russ for keeping me in the loop, here are comments from my point of view in the hope of being useful, please do not take them as objections; I know that you have looked at the problem through many more angles than I did. By the way, sorry in advance if what I write today has been already a