Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
of the above" and fixes two typos.
Rationale
=
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a
Simon McVittie writes:
> Also a TC member but writing only on my own behalf. I agree with Gunnar
> that NOTA seems fine as a default for TC decisions (except for choosing
> the TC chair, which is special-cased to have no default).
Okay, sounds good. That's multiple people in support and no one
I've lost track of who wrote:
> > > Suggest making this "None of the above" instead of "Further discussion"
> > > to avoid two different default options for TC decisions vs project
> > > decisions.
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 10:28:55 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I would prefer the change to extend al
Russ Allbery dijo [Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 03:41:18PM -0800]:
> >>1. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose a resolution.
> >> This creates an initial two-option ballot, the other option
> >> being the default option of "Further discussion." The proposer
> >>
Jonathan Carter dijo [Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:43:27PM +0200]:
> Ah, I also had one, but can wait my turn. I considered starting a thread in
> -project in the meantime, but I'm slightly concerned of information overload
> between a large discussion on -project and a running vote.
>
> Not to complic
5 matches
Mail list logo
