Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Philip Hands
Steve McIntyre writes: .. > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:51:10PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: >>Debian with the non-free drivers... > > We're talking about non-free **firmware, not non-free > **drivers**. Sorry to play the pedant card here (and I know you know > the difference!), but this is a common

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Philip Hands
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes: ... > I'm wondering how the d-i team feels about that (having the image with > non-free > bits called unofficial). Or whether it makes any sense at all, say, having > such > an essential component developed by fellow Debian members, using official > Debian resources

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hello, I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original proposal. = The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the Debian archive available for d

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/23/22 10:53, Simon Josefsson wrote: "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: In practice, the free installer is useless on its own. That is not my experience -- I'm using Debian through its installer on a number of laptops, desktops and servers, and for my purposes it works fine and in general I hav

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/23/22 18:24, Ansgar wrote: I don't know much 10+ years hardware still in productive use... For ecological reasons, we decided to try (whenever possible) to use servers as long as possible, as much as 15 years. In many cases that's possible. For example, old Dell PowerEdge R610 servers ca

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:14:38AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > For ecological reasons, we decided to try (whenever possible) to use servers > as long as possible, as much as 15 years. In many cases that's possible. For > example, old Dell PowerEdge R610 servers can be equipped with 2x newer CPUs

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bart Martens (2022-08-24 10:12:48) > = > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images > and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the Debian > archive available for download alongside with the free me

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Moin On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:05:21AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > My recent experience with servers (10 and 25 Gbits/s dual port SFP+) is that > you need firmware for network cards when running with: > - Broadcom (bnx2 / bnx2x) > - Qlogic > - Intel (they partially work without the firmware-mi

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Philip Hands dijo [Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:10:49AM +0200]: > IIRC the "official" thing came in because someone produced a CD for a > magazine cover for some early release (1.2 maybe?) that was actually > slightly pre-release, 1.0, no less. With all the magic that 1.0 implies. > because their publ

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hi Steve, Thanks for this. I have two questions about your proposal. Apologies if these are answered elsewhere already. On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I'm proposing to change how we handle non-free firmware in > Debian. > So, I propose the following: > > ===

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Gard Spreemann dijo [Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 08:58:47AM +0200]: > On August 23, 2022 5:38:52 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Josefsson > wrote: > > I have no problem > >with builtin non-upgradeable firmware -- see > >https://ryf.fsf.org/about/criteria for rationale. > Hi! > > I've always had a really hard tim

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:20:15PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > > > With this GR proposal there would no longer be an installer without those > > non-free bits. > > Would you consider proposing an alternative ballot option, I just di

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original proposal. > > = > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images > and live images) containing packag

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:14:26PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Bart Martens (2022-08-24 10:12:48) > > = > > > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images > > and live images) containing packages from the non-free secti

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 10:10 +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > Does anyone still mass-produce CDs? I don't know about mass-produce, but surprisingly there are still Debian CD vendors in parts of the world where Internet is everywhere. https://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ > I think we could simply forge

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Hello all El 24/8/22 a las 10:12, Bart Martens escribió: Hello, I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original proposal. = The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images and live images) containing packages fro

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Hello all El 22/8/22 a las 19:32, Gunnar Wolf escribió: I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original proposal. I'm only suggesting to modify the third paragraph, offering to produce two sets of images (fully-free and with-non-free-firmware), being the later more prominent

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

2022-08-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bart Martens (2022-08-24 23:08:12) > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 07:14:26PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Bart Martens (2022-08-24 10:12:48) > > > = > > > > > > The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer > > > images > >