Re: Possible draft non-free firmware option with SC change

2022-09-09 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups >6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor Cuba/Iran/North Korea/Syria are excluded by most non-free licenses. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ʀᴜꜱꜱɪᴀɴᴇꜱ ᴇᴜɴᴛ ᴅᴏᴍᴜꜱ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ⠈⠳⣄

Re: What does FD Mean

2021-04-13 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > Adam Borowski writes: > > Here's how this works in the real world: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donkey_vote > > > > As our ballots routinely get sorted (systemd was FBADHEG$) according to the

Re: What does FD Mean

2021-04-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > * Adrian Bunk [2021-04-11 20:53]: > > I am not saying people were stupid. > Okay, that was hyperbolic. But you have to admit that you don't seem to > put much confidence in people's ability (or willingness) to read the > explanations

Re: What does FD Mean

2021-04-04 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 09:49:01PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > I'd rather have a None of the Above default option all the time along > > with FD. It'd probably help. > > FD effectively is the same as "none of the above".

Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5

2021-04-03 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > TEXT OF OPTION 5 > > > Debian refuses to participate in and denounces the witch-hunt against Richard > Stallman, the Free Software Foundation, and the members of the board of the > Free Software Foundation. > >

Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5

2021-04-03 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:59:53PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > The last amendment (before mine) was accepted on March 30th, which means the > > earliest a vote can be called with a shortened 1 week discussion period is > > April 7th

Re: "rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/

2021-03-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:12:09AM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote: > ---8<---8<---8<--- > The Debian Project co-signs the statement regarding Richard Stallman's > readmission to the FSF board seen at https://rms-support-letter.github.io/. > The text of this statement is given below. > > Richard M

Re: Willingness to share a position statement?

2021-03-23 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:56:39PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hello, > > I hope not to be too inflamatory with this. As you are surely aware, > last week Richard Stallman was reinstated as part of the Board of > Directors of the FSF. That is something deeply disturbing and > confidence-shattering

Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects

2021-03-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: > But the Flosspols study of 2005 had already made the point that > this might be a problem for diversity: there are 10 times more women working > in proprietary software (~20%) than in free software (~2%) Data for Debian: 0.9% Method

Re: [draft] Cancel this year's in-person Debian Developers Conference DebConf20

2020-05-22 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:29:39AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > They have until the GR is ready for a vote to do the right thing. Then why make a GR to override the decision? Everyone is already able to vote with their legs: no one of us can force another to come. So if you're not going to go, w

Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:12:18PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo dijo [Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:19:27PM +0100]: > > > > i.e. the only accepted "investigation" > > > > method, likewise take a ton of time (and the fairly limited amount of > > > > empathy from the people doing it). > > >

Re: Option G update [signed] (was Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations)

2019-12-06 Thread Adam Borowski
> X< > Title: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple > implementations > > Principles > ~~ > > The Debian project reaffirms its commitment to be the glue that binds > and integrates different software that provides similar or equivalent > functionality, with

Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations

2019-11-30 Thread Adam Borowski
[I purposefully abstained in participating in this discussion so far, as I have quite strong views, and I hoped it will stay mostly civilised. But alas, last developments seem to fails these hopes. Thus, let's help Guillem improve his proposal.] On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:11:56PM -0500, Sam Hart

Re: Are Martin and Sam's platforms equivalent?

2019-04-03 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:40:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I hesitate to bang this drum again, but this would be a great place to > think about how we can use git more. > > Ideally, our default sponsorship workflow would *not involve source > packages or orig tarballs at all*. It's too easy t

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2019: Call for nominations

2019-03-14 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > On 2019/03/14 13:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > I hereby nominate myself for the DPL election 2019. > > I hereby nominate myself for the 2019 DPL election. Mwahahaha, so we managed to guilt-trip you two into stepping forward, so the

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

2018-04-02 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 04:11:40PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > If someone does go down the road, then any project creation on salsa > > would possibly end up needing to be vetted by an admin (or a new team > > doing this, or a combi