On 7/7/24 21:53, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam Majer writes:
IFF moving to SHA256 repos is impossible because no one cares to fix it,
then at very least these tags must use additional hashing for purposes of
tree verification.
I consider it an ethical obligation as someone who works in security
Hi,
I admittedly did not go so far as to track down test objects with the same
SHA-1 hash and construct an experiment. But I couldn't see any way where
git fsck could *not* detect this problem unless I'm wrong that it
recalculates all the hashes, and I'm fairly sure I'm not wrong about that.
Sam Hartman wrote:
I ask you to be responsible in looking at the results of this
election. If the results make it clear that most of the voters have
made up their minds and are done with the discussion, then let the
issue rest.
I hope that the above can be one of the unwritten laws. Here in Ca
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Anthony Towns has been arguing that the non-free archive really *is*
part of Debian, that while it isn't part of the "Debian Distribution",
it is obviously a part of the system as a whole.
This disregards the current text of the Social Contract section 5,
which is ve
Sam Hartman wrote:
I ask you to be responsible in looking at the results of this
election. If the results make it clear that most of the voters have
made up their minds and are done with the discussion, then let the
issue rest.
I hope that the above can be one of the unwritten laws. Here in Canad
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Anthony Towns has been arguing that the non-free archive really *is*
part of Debian, that while it isn't part of the "Debian Distribution",
it is obviously a part of the system as a whole.
This disregards the current text of the Social Contract section 5,
which is very
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:22:14 -0500 (EST), Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Yes I do. Or rather I think it could be. As anecdotal evidence
mine is as good as yours. Let me ask you then, how would you go
about setting up an experiment to test the hypothesis tha
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:22:14 -0500 (EST), Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Yes I do. Or rather I think it could be. As anecdotal evidence
mine is as good as yours. Let me ask you then, how would you go
about setting up an experiment to test the hypothesis that D
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:03:43 +, Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Currently most of the developers in the western world are
men. Currently most of the new teachers in the USA are women. DPL
can't be asked to change that. [Normal] Governmental pol
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:03:43 +, Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Currently most of the developers in the western world are
men. Currently most of the new teachers in the USA are women. DPL
can't be asked to change that. [Normal] Governmental pol
Helen Faulkner wrote:
I wasn't assuming that. I'm technically not that bad myself. That's
not the point. The point is that *on average* I believe a woman is
going to feel less confident about this stuff than a man with similar
skill. Do you have anoher suggestion as to why women don't get
Helen Faulkner wrote:
I wasn't assuming that. I'm technically not that bad myself. That's
not the point. The point is that *on average* I believe a woman is
going to feel less confident about this stuff than a man with similar
skill. Do you have anoher suggestion as to why women don't get
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:47:58PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > No, in fact I'd venture to say it's unacceptable.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > Not only is it acceptable, bu
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:47:58PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > No, in fact I'd venture to say it's unacceptable.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > Not only is it acceptable, b
14 matches
Mail list logo