On Thu, 2024-06-27 15:15:42 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> =
> BEGIN FORMAL RESOLUTION TEXT
>
> tag2upload allows DDs and DMs to upload simply by using the
> git-debpush(1) script to push a signed git tag.
>
> 1. tag2upload, in the form designed and implemented by Sean Whitton and
>Ian Jack
On Sun, 2016-07-17 17:56:12 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other
On Mon, 2014-12-01 12:20:25 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> ===
> The Constitution is amended as follows:
>
> ---
> --- constitution.txt.orig 2014-
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:36:41AM +, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
>The list of organizations I'm aware of having Debian monies is:
>
>Associação SoftwareLivre.org (Brazil)
>Associazione Software Libero (Italy)
>Debian UK
>Debian Switzerland
>Linux-Aktivaattori (Finland)
>SPI
>Verein zur Förderung Frei
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:17:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>It's also the most reliable way for a developer to issue a statement of
>support that will be seen by voters prior to the vote. Many voters
>don't follow debian-vote and won't follow the pro/con discussions in
>detail, but the debian
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>=
>General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
>Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
>discussion and/or voting o
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:45:57AM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> s/the release team are/the release team is/
Sorry, that was wrong.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:20:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:45:56AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>>,[ Proposal 4: Allow release managers leeway to include non-dfsg bits as
>>needed ]
>>| Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't tr
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:43:47AM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>- "Aníbal Monsalve Salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>The Sun employee is the Chief Open Source Officer at Sun Microsystems,
>>Simon Phipps.
>
>I'll be at Apachecon in two wee
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:39:35AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>
>>>An example of such a package is glibc (bug#382175). I don't think
>>>that removing SUNRPC s
; AMENDMENT PROPOSAL ====
Seconded.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ttp://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal
>Kind regards
>Nico
>--
>Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
>For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
he method specified in section
> A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure. The quorum is the same
> as for a General Resolution (4.2) and the default option is "None
> Of The Above".
> 8. The Project Leader serves for one year from their election.
>=
who wish to reuse the keyring for granting
> access to services to some or all Debian Maintainers may do so
> according to their own judgement, of course.
>
> In particular, this means that Debian maintainers do not participate
> in the general resolution procedure defined in the Debian constitution,
> and cannot vote in Debian elections.
>
> Debian Maintainers Proposal
>
>Seconds, comments or amendments appreciated.
Seconded.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * Appication Managers may advocate their n-m applicants but
s/Appication/Application
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Etch,
>| as long as we are legally allowed to do so, and the firmware is
>| distributed upstream under a license that complies with the DFSG.
>`
Seconded.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o, and the formware is
>>| distributed under a DFSG free license.
>>`
>
>Minor typo:
>s/formware/firmware/
Also, instead of "a DFSG free license" I would prefer "a DFSG
compliant license" as DFSG already implies "free".
>Seconded with corrected typo or as it is.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ith corrected typo or as it is.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e following had sconded the previous draft, I hope
> there is no problem with the changes made with this version.
>
> 1) Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2) Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (unsigned message)
> 3) Aníbal Monsalve S
hip in SPI by virtue of their status as Developers.
>>
>>and should be clearly marked as part of the changes.
>>
>>Seconded, if you approve this editorial change to the GR. :)
>
>Same here, seconded in that case.
Seconded (again) if vorlon's suggestion is approved by Manoj.
Best Regards,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
operty held in trust for Debian when
>asked to do so by a General Resolution of the Developers, provided
>that this is compatible with SPI's legal authority.
> 6. SPI will notify the Developers by electronic mail to a Debian
>Project mailing list when it uses or disposes of property held in
>trust for Debian.
>
>
>
>manoj
>
>--
>(Never thought I'd be telling Malcolm and Ilya the same thing... :-)
>Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
>1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y refer to, or any of the traditional
> free software licenses like the the GPL or the BSD license.
>
>--->8---
Seconded.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on to date.
>---
>
>It's based on Manoj's draft position statement [2] with some notable
>changes (an explicit "why not just say docs != software" section, a
>"how can this be fixed" section, a "what is the GFDL?" section, and
>reordering the major problems). I've put the above draft on the wiki
>[3] so people can tweak it.
>
>Cheers,
>aj
>
>[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00019.html
>[1] http://bugs.debian.org/usertag:debian-release@lists.debian.org:gfdl
>[2] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html
>[3] http://wiki.debian.org/GFDLPositionStatement
Seconded.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- security problems don't get special treatment; they can be vetoed
> by the post's author though
> - specific details for overriding the team's decisions by the
> developers
>
>Seconds so far:
>
> Don Armstrong (original or Manoj's changes)
> Jo
24 matches
Mail list logo
