Anthony Towns wrote:
If there are really that many DDs that are morons that they need to be
dealt with by policy, n-m isn't doing its job.
I'm sure there are quite a few who predate NM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
snip
What this also does is getting you out of touch with your (possible)
sponsors, as now you let them upload once, advocate you, then you upload
following versions yourself. A year later you have a new package and
need to find a sponsor again, beginning from point
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:56:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 2/20/07, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Feb 20, 2007 at 09:37:44 +, MJ Ray wrote:
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to devel-announce: [...]
What
I second this proposal (quoted below).
Martin Wuertele wrote:
I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
the Package Policy
MJ Ray wrote:
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You said:
ITYM wrote.
Say (said, saying, says):
2. To express in words: Say what's on your mind.
3. a. To state as one's opinion or judgment; declare: I say let's eat out.
b. To state as a determination of fact: It's hard to say
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mar 7 Mars 2006 12:59, Frank Küster a écrit :
I agree with that. What is really painful in the NM queue, as I lived
it, is the time between the steps [1]:
[Received application] - [Application Manager Assigned]
and between :
[Appliaction Manager recommends to
If you were not running for DPL, which of the other candiates would you
most likely vote for (or since you are running, rank as '2' on your
ballot)? Why?
Which of the other canidate's platform statements do you agree with, and
which do you not? If you are elected as DPL, do you think that you
7 matches
Mail list logo
