On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 21:39:47 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes:
> > On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Ean Schuessler writes:
> >>> I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not
> >&g
ntentionally short and simple.
The specific process to use concerning consequences as well as the specific
consequences are a related but separate matter. For the CoC it's enough to
simply say that there are consequences and a hint about what could
realistically be done.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 09:40:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD
rights?"):
> > On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:53:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > The purpose of a bug report is not to help solve t
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 20:34:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes:
> > Seriously, what I'm trying to do is lower the number of cases which
> > cause frustration and which don't get any traction. Between the "
> > *close* " problem, the mai
I'm on the -project list, so no need to CC me directly. (Fine if you do,
though.)
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:53:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD
rights?"):
> > The #1 kind of bug reports that become proble
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 18:35:40, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > As a bug reporter dealing with a misbehaving maintainer, this is
> >
> > what I would want:
> > 1. A clear place to report the misbehavior
>
> ow...@
n-candidate responses, please follow up there.
Okay, I've just signed up for [debian-project]. I'm in a bit of a rush at the
moment, but will respond tomorrow.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Friday, March 29, 2013 13:46:56, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:35:59PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > As such, there's an issue of "public perception" that may need
> > consideration.
>
> […]
>
> > I simultaneously ackn
On Friday, March 29, 2013 09:41:23, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:37:18PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > Technically the DAM has the ability to act to remove a DD (per Debian
> > Constitution 8.1 item 2), but the information I can gather so far seems
>
orted to go up, not steadily down.
As a bug reporter dealing with a misbehaving maintainer, this is what I would
want:
1. A clear place to report the misbehavior
2. A set of guidelines maintainers should follow
3. A public dialog about the misbehavior with some Debian authority
along
10 matches
Mail list logo
