[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> "D. Starner" writes:
> [...]
> If you want the developers to approve your
> GR
I don't agree with the GR as it stands. The release manager should
decide whether or not to release AMD64 with Sarge. I prefer that
we c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> I'd be happy to think through it, but only if you give me details.
> What you've give above is a pre-processed conclusion, in which you
> tell me the way you want me to think about it, but you seem to have
> carefully extracted all the technic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only valid reasons for not including it are lack of LSB compliance
> > (which can still be easily achieved with a i386 chroot) and mirror space
> > (which will be saved using partial mirroring)
> if you want to argue with what i'm saying then argue over the content, don't
> make some stupid pedantic fight over word choices. it's just another boring
> variant of the spelling-flame.
People take offense at words designed to be offensive, and no one would bother
to use such words as fuck if
> if you want to argue with what i'm saying then argue over the content, don't
> make some stupid pedantic fight over word choices. it's just another boring
> variant of the spelling-flame.
People take offense at words designed to be offensive, and no one would bother
to use such words as fuck if
5 matches
Mail list logo
