> least favourite and most favourite aspect of APT?
Basically yes, but as these are by now mostly answered more seriously
than I was asking/hoping for by other threads I am fine.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he things which are
truely Debian as even their version number indicate that they are only
useful in Debian are not (yet) the responsibility of all of Debian but
of some people only.
Thanks for replying so quickly to mail you were unsure about how to;
it isn't a lot to be chewed on, but every bit counts!
Moo,
David Kalnischkies
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00013.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing the time they lost working on that thing which fell out of
fashion soon after the DPL was revealed to be a redhat sockpuppet.
Some timelines might be more likely than others.
In summary, I was kinda expecting a different reply with less dodging,
but then again I am not sure what I was really expecting. After all,
what are you expecting than you sent out a bunch of questions roughly
qualifying as small talk with hints of drama seeking to a bunch of
politicians campaining for election.
So desperate the apparent lack of actual APT specific content there are
still some bits I will give supercow to chew on further. Thanks!
Moo,
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t mail was written yesterday, I feared people would get the
idea I would be joking. I am not, well, except the speech part).
Moo,
David Kalnischkies
¹ with an exception for the 1% of packages which actually really need it
and are deploying DPKG_ROOT at least. The rest should really make due
with decla
y prepared you want to share with us but nobody has managed to
ask the right question yet (so that the next apt release will be
a botnet calculating the question)?
[I am of course 100% serious and expect as much in return given that
it will show your voters how well you are equipped to deal wit
sons…
Beside: Is that really how it should be done? Debian decides not to
touch the past, but any random developer might decide to ignore that and
run his own process anyhow with his/her own rules… I don't think so.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:40:41PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> I would be very interested in an explanation [off-list & encrypted if
> it is too private] as I can't come up with a reason why that could be
> a concious decision to not show the number of mails sent to d-priv
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:48:02PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> David Kalnischkies writes ("Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for
> declassification of the debian-private mailing list"):
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:07:47PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Basic exam
it
is yes until it is further discussed (and in this proposal it would be
cemented as yes).
b) tl;dr: "In listmasters we trust"
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:46:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 07:56:07PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > If on the other hand we say: Listmaster can come up with a proposal
> > which can be discussed and as ultima ratio vetoed by GR (or by DPL via
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:08:22PM +, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:40 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> > In other words: You believe in the serious possibility that
> > listmasters
> > are evil people who will propose a process violating t
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:14:49AM +, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 19:56 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 03:45:12PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Or as an "Explain like I'm Five" question: Why is the idea that
>
come public
knowledge is at the very least equally wrong. aka: d-private is Debians
archived online version of water-cooler talk. Sometimes, historically
significant things happen around the water-cooler, but most of the time…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
"Three may keep a Secret, if two of them are dead."
-- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:09:50PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> >
>> > NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that
>> > is in the Debian keyring.
>> >
>>
&g
the rest
are at most (= in the Levenshtein distance sense) developers…
(a mindset of which I am not really a fan, but that is another topic)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies, who writes this as a break from "deity" debugging,
so don't try to read too much sense into it if you don'
15 matches
Mail list logo
