Re: GR Proposal: replace "Chairman" with "Chair" throughout the Debian Constitution

Hello, On 21 July 2016 at 10:15, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi Marga, > > I second this amendment, although it introduces a minor awkwardness: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: >> - The Technical Committee and/or its Chairman; >> + The

In plain English please?! Re: General resolution: Changes to the Standard Resolution Procedure

Hello, On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote: > Hi, > > A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution > Procedure. Details about it can be found on: > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002 > I'm failing to understand

Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate?

On 4 November 2014 16:25, Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:37:45PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: Russ Allbery wrote: Gerrit Pape p...@dbnbgs.smarden.org writes: On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Real problems? Apart from

Re: Call for Votes: General Resolution: Init system coupling

On 4 November 2014 21:30, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote: - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e [ ] Choice 1:

Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

On 17 October 2014 13:44, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current Project Leader, and thus does not require

Re: [RFC] Alternative proposal: reaffirm upstream and maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain

On 17 October 2014 10:14, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: Dears, I'd like to draft an alternative proposal to the GR. Would anybody consider it a nice addition to the proposals we currently have, and eventually second it if I asked for it? Of course, improvements to the text are

Re: Can I vote?

Hello Gonzalo, Thank you for your email and your concerns and opinions. Let me re-assure you that our users and the free software are our highest priorities. However, to answer your question in the subject line, no, you cannot vote in this resolution as only Debian Members are allowed to vote.

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I second Ian's Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems. https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html Regards, Dimitri. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1