Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:06:22 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote: Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked: Are there many other greynesses in how the SC and the DFSG are interpreted? Amazingly few, but yes, [...] Licences are another type of greyness: unlike Mozilla's software, it's very easy

Re: Question to all the candidates: please explain GR-2006-001

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:22:36 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 15:58:00 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:48:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] To all candidates who wish to respond: How did you vote for the GR on the GFDL[1] (GR-2006

Question to all the candidates: please explain GR-2006-001

.: Please Cc: me on replies, as I am not a list subscriber. Thanks. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/etch_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian etch installation walk-through? . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE

Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ?

_Coming to America_ . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpR2Y3Eojese.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Question about GR-2006-004

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:43:55 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 09 Oct 2006, Francesco Poli wrote: OK, but reaffirming the literal meaning of DFSG#2 now does not help a future discussion where the DFSG will hopefully be changed to unambiguously affect all works (both programmatic

Re: Question about GR-2006-004

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 23:04:21 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 08 Oct 2006, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] In other words, TTBOMK, *all* works distributed in the Debian system (i.e. in main), be they programmatic or non-programmatic, *must* be distributed with the form that the copyright

Question about GR-2006-004

to America_ . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpDFvZqh1IDT.pgp Description: PGP signature