On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:49:51AM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Sat Mar 14 19:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
It makes an advisory project statement about the project interpretation of
the FD. DDs can choose to follow that interpretation or not as they
choose in their own work, but I would
Hi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:21:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Hi,
I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
Thank you for proposing this option. I really like it's constructive tone.
The
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 01:12:11PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
| We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce
| mailinglist is not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large
| part of our community. We
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192
[ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided
[ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform
Hi Neil
Thanks for the prompt clarification.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:49:33PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or
to projects funding Debian or
| helping towards the release of Etch.
`
A)
From: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:08:38 +0200
Good signature from 3DFC2C62AF79D29E Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
B)
From: Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:39:52AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
I'm sorry for the typo, it is Dunc-Tank. Updated text attached.
How embarassing. I keep making typos, I hope this cheers readers up.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:12:00AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
2. Asks for too broad knowledge
It has been suggested several times over the years that we ask too
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:59:34PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:05:04AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Hi Kevin.
I'm not sure that I understand the reasons why the efforts couldn't be
reported, at least to debian-private. Are they one or more of the
following,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:00:54AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: debian-vote@lists.debian.org archive/latest/10820
And the second quote is from:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please also not the text immediately
[ Removed d-devel, IMHO it's enough to discuss this on d-vote ]
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:19:55AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin escreveu:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
The first type of publication could
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of
publications:
1) Selected Readers
2) Selected Content
The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of
debian-private, but restrictions will be
13 matches
Mail list logo
