On 14.09.10 10:53, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Of all those topics, one topic *might* have consensus already: accepting
as DDs contributors which have contributed a lot to Debian doing
non-packaging work, which intend to continue doing so, and which are
ready to uphold our Foundation Documents.
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
About freeze timing we think that DebConf should definitely not fall
into a freeze
We noticed that releases in the first quarter of the year
worked
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:53 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
DFSG is a guideline and a target: we must no go far as the nearest point
we reached, but it still a guideline.
Consider:
- we never had a full DFSG Debian (also when DFSG was written)
- we have RC also
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:06 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I think this is the core of the disagreement. I do not call it a
temporary override of a foundation document; I call it a temporary
practical consensus between the needs of our users and the needs of
the free
Hello,
The question seems very simple: Why do you [not] candidate?,
but I'm looking more about:
- Why only two candidates ?
- Is it good for campaign and discussions?
- Why so low interest for DPL?
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Also, I don't think we that are there yet: maybe objections against
Joerg's decision^Hproposal were raised but not addressed (not only on
the process that Joerg followed, but also on the content of his
proposal). Also, we have alternative proposals (Lars' and Raphael's).
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11551 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) are
suspended [§4.1(3)]. This suspension is effective immediately [§4.2(2.2)].
I do not understand why
Martin Schulze wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040226 08:55]:
We cannot include it in Debian anyway, since it is non-free. If Debian
stops distributing it but people will build ftp.non-free.org, what's
the different from the users' perspective? A new
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:01:38PM +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
So, to apply this system to ICANN, we would have to build the At Large
membership by cooptation, ie each new member would have to be
introduced by another one. This could be somewhat interesting, but I
guess
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:01:38PM +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
So, to apply this system to ICANN, we would have to build the At Large
membership by cooptation, ie each new member would have to be
introduced by another one. This could be somewhat interesting, but I
10 matches
Mail list logo
