Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"

"Art. 3 (1) ‘product with digital elements’ means any software or hardware product ... (18) ‘manufacturer’ means any natural or legal person who develops or manufactures products with digital elements ... and markets them under his or her name or trademark, whether for payment or free of charge;

Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"

Am 12.11.23 um 19:01 schrieb Luca Boccassi: Yes - if it's "made available on the market", which is in the first bit that was snipped. Pushing a repository on Gitlab is not "making available on the market". You are wrong. It is. That's why the proposal has: "(10d) The sole act of hosting

Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"

Am 12.11.23 um 18:38 schrieb Luca Boccassi: Which definitions does the proposal use? Could you please quote them? The first two links do not provide any, as far as I can see. The third link (a blog post, not a piece of legislation) explicitly says: "the Cyber Resilience Act does not define

Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"

Am 12.11.23 um 18:09 schrieb Luca Boccassi: > We do know whether something is commercial or not though ... I sincerely doubt that. Just to illustrate this I'm citing a part (only a part) of one of the regulation drafts which are presently considered in trilogue. "(10) Only free and open-source